Difference between 2n and (2n) ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between factorials, particularly addressing the equation (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. It emphasizes that (2n+2)! cannot be simplified to (2n+2)*2n! because the latter does not account for the additional multiplicative factors from (2n+1) down to 1. Additionally, it distinguishes between 2n! and (2n)!, explaining that 2n! represents twice the value of n!, while (2n)! is the factorial of all integers up to 2n. An example illustrates that while 2*3! equals 12, (2*3)! equals 720, highlighting the difference in definitions. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for solving problems involving factorials correctly.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
hey. I've had no education in factorials specifically, but my professor is expecting us to already know this stuff...

In a problem where factorials are included, it is claimed (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. Shouldn't it be (2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?

In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. "(2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?" No, why?

2. "In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?"

2*n! is twice the value of n!
(2n!) is the factorial up to the number 2n

For example, 2*3! =12, whereas (2*3)!=6!=720
 
Nikitin said:
hey. I've had no education in factorials specifically, but my professor is expecting us to already know this stuff...

In a problem where factorials are included, it is claimed (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2n+1)*(2n)!. Shouldn't it be (2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?

In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?

What is a factorial? n! is defined as being all the positive integers up to and including n being multiplied together, so n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1

Ok, using this idea, what would (2n+2)! be? Well, first we multiply by (2n+2), then we reduce the value by 1 and multiply by that, so we multiply by ((2n+2)-1) = (2n+1).

Yes,
2n! = 2*(n!) = 2*(n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1)

while
(2n)! = (2n)(2n-1)(2n-2)...*3*2*1
 
arildno said:
1. "(2n+2)!= (2n+2)*2n! ?" No, why?

2. "In addition, is there any difference between 2n! and (2n)! ?"

2*n! is twice the value of n!
(2n!) is the factorial up to the number 2n

For example, 2*3! =12, whereas (2*3)!=6!=720

1. Doesn't (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2(n-1)+2)*(2(n-2)+2)!

2. Ah yes. How could I miss that? damn, i guess I'm exhausted.

What is a factorial? n! is defined as being all the positive integers up to and including n being multiplied together, so n! = n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1

Ok, using this idea, what would (2n+2)! be? Well, first we multiply by (2n+2), then we reduce the value by 1 and multiply by that, so we multiply by ((2n+2)-1) = (2n+1).

Yes,
2n! = 2*(n!) = 2*(n(n-1)(n-2)...3*2*1)

while
(2n)! = (2n)(2n-1)(2n-2)...*3*2*1

ah, OK. thanks 4 the help
 
Nikitin said:
1. Doesn't (2n+2)! = (2n+2)*(2(n-1)+2)*(2(n-2)+2)!

I have a feeling you might be getting this mixed up with the techniques you learned in Mathematical induction?

Let's give n a value, say, n=5

(2n+2)! = (2*5+2)! = 12! = 12*11*...*3*2

Now, 2(n-1)+2 = 2*4+2 = 10.
Notice how 10 is 2 less than 12, because we didn't take 1 away from the value 12, we took a value away from n, which is being multiplied by 2, so if we followed what you wrote we'd end up with 12! = 12*10*8*6*4*2

Essentially, if we have a linear equation an+b for some constants a and b, then an+b-1 \neq a(n-1)+b unless a = 1.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top