Lyman, Ballmer, Paschen series?

  • Thread starter Thread starter krackers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The Lyman, Balmer, and Paschen series refer to the emission spectra produced when an electron transitions from higher energy levels to lower ones in hydrogen. The confusion arises from the understanding that the 1s1 configuration indicates the ground state, but hydrogen can exist in multiple excited states beyond this. Electrons can indeed fall from these excited states to the ground state or other lower energy levels, resulting in the observed spectral lines. The transitions are accurately described as falling to n=1 for Lyman, n=2 for Balmer, and n=3 for Paschen. Understanding these concepts clarifies the behavior of hydrogen's electron transitions.
krackers
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

These series are the names given to the emission spectra when an electron gets excited and then falls from n=x to n=1 for Lyman, n=2 for Ballmer, and n=3 for Paschen series right? However, I though hydrogen only has 1 energy level, as the electronic configuration is 1s1. How can an electron fall from a higher energy level then? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
krackers said:
Hello there!

These series are the names given to the emission spectra when an electron gets excited and then falls from n=x to n=1 for Lyman, n=2 for Ballmer, and n=3 for Paschen series right? However, I though hydrogen only has 1 energy level, as the electronic configuration is 1s1. How can an electron fall from a higher energy level then? Please help!

You are confused. The 1s1 configuration refers to the ground state. All atoms have only one ground state. Hydrogen(as well as other atoms) has an infinite number of excited states, and there can transitions between the different states. You have described the Lyman, Balmer, and Paschen transitions correctly.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top