Are static models totally static?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Models Static
AI Thread Summary
Static models in cosmology are not completely unchanging; they allow for movement and interactions, such as gravitational effects and cosmic events like colliding galaxies. While these models do not account for universal expansion, they can still describe dynamic processes within a static framework. Various static and steady state models exist, including discredited ones like Hoyle's and more recent proposals that incorporate observations of an expanding universe. The discussion highlights the confusion around the term "static" and its implications in cosmological literature. Overall, static models can exhibit evolution despite their foundational premise of no expansion.
Lino
Messages
309
Reaction score
4
Hi, I appreciate the basics if static models, but I'm wondering just how static they are. I understand there is no expansion, but is there any element of evolution? (For example, colliding galaxies, collapsing dust clouds, etc.)

Regards,

Noel.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Static doesn't mean no movement. Everything is moving and react to gravitation and quantum effects. No big bang, no expansion, just there.
 
Thanks Jedisshrfu. That's what I figured, but couldn't find confirmation in any of the literature.

Regards,

Noel.
 
Thanks jedishrfu.

Regards,

Noel.
 
What static model are you referring to? There are steady state models such as Hoyles (now discredited model) and more mdoern steady sate models such as steady state eternal inflation. A new static model was pubslihsed a few months ago:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5550
but I believe all of these models allow for observations of an expanding universe and galaxies colliding etc but perhaps that's now what you are referring to.
 
Thanks for the reply skydivephil. A lot of the arxiv items that I have read lately refer simply "static models" in various contexts. I was pretty sure that this (generally) did not mean completely unchanging ... but I could not find any clarification.

Regards,

Noel.
 
Back
Top