Total Work out of Three Bodies (Thermodynamics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around extracting maximum work from three thermal bodies with different temperatures while reaching an equal final temperature. The user calculates the heat extracted from each body using the formula Qi=C(Ti-Tf) and sums these to find the work done, W=ƩQi. Concerns arise regarding the second law of thermodynamics and whether total heat conversion into work is permissible. It is clarified that while total conversion is forbidden in cyclic processes, it may be possible in non-cyclic or irreversible processes. The user seeks further clarity on the definitions of reversible and irreversible processes to resolve their confusion.
Mathoholic!
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
The problem is:

Having three bodies with thermal capacities (C) as sources of heat to a heat machine, what is the maximum work I can extract from this system, given that the bodies are at temperatures T3, T2 and T1 (T3>T2>T1), leaving them at an equal final temperature?

I tackled this problem by assuming that the amount of heat I can extract from each body is:

Qi=C(Ti-Tf) i=1,2,3

And so:

W=ƩQi

Now, I'm not sure if I'm breaking the second law of thermodynamics by totally converting heat into work. This is where I'm kind of stuck.

So, if anyone can help me figure out how to solve this and other type-like problems, it'd be great.

Thank you :)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Now, I'm not sure if I'm breaking the second law of thermodynamics by totally converting heat into work. This is where I'm kind of stuck.

The second law forbids the total conversion of heat into work in a cyclic process.

It does not forbid it for some part of a process that is not cyclic.

So post details of your proposed system and process for further comment.
 
1Are you saying that I can only fully convert heat into work in a irreversible process?

I'm not sure I can give much more detail about the system. I've already given all there's to know about the problem.

I'm having trouble getting the definitions of reversible process and irreversible process clear in my head. It's all a bit fuzzy and I think that's what is keeping me from solving this problem.
 
Cyclic is not the same as reversible.

You get back to the same conditions (set of thermodynamic values) in each case, but the paths are different.

There are no real reversible processs which must be under equilibrium at all stages.

Cyclic processes may include non equilibrium processes. Irreversible processes are non equilibrium.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
16K
Back
Top