Aftermath of polymerization of EtOH

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weissritter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    polymerization
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a series of chemical reactions involving high-purity ethanol and sulfuric acid, which produce ethene that can be polymerized into polyethylene using FeCl3. The reactions are described as potentially impressive, likened to magic, and could be used for educational purposes or entertainment. Concerns are raised about the aftermath of these reactions, particularly regarding the difficulty of removing polyethylene from glass lab equipment, suggesting that disposable containers, like plastic bottles, might be more practical. There is also a consideration of using a copper wire to facilitate the reaction, as it may enhance polymerization on its surface. Additionally, the importance of conducting the reactions in a closed system is highlighted to prevent the loss of ethylene gas, emphasizing safety and practicality in experimental setups.
Weissritter
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
In a very similar way to my first post ever, a short series of reactions came to mind that could be seen as apparent magic. You could use it for gaining instantaneous fame in a party, convincing people into pay attention to chemistry in basic levels of education and in conjunction with a time machine you could use it for making people believe you are a real magician.
In a recipient of any kind, high-purity ethanol, which can be bought pretty much everywhere, is mixed with sulfuric acid. The ethanol becomes ethene. (Does it become some sort of equilibrium situation there?). Now, the ethene is polymerized with FeCl3 and polyethylene appears "magically". These two reactions are easy to understand for me. What bugs me is the aftermath. If done in any glass-lab recipient, I can only imagine polyethylene would stick to it, rendering it useless for using it anytime else. So should these reactions be done in something disponsable, like a plastic bottle, for ensuring minimal costs?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You could think about putting a thin loop of copper wire into the glass beaker. what I believe may happen is that the reaction will be catalyzed at the metal surface due to higher surface energy relative to glass, and that the solidification of polyethylene will nucleate preferentially on the metal.

i think you can reuse the wire by melting off the polymer.

However I never tried this.
 
Weissritter said:
In a very similar way to my first post ever, a short series of reactions came to mind that could be seen as apparent magic. You could use it for gaining instantaneous fame in a party, convincing people into pay attention to chemistry in basic levels of education and in conjunction with a time machine you could use it for making people believe you are a real magician.
In a recipient of any kind, high-purity ethanol, which can be bought pretty much everywhere, is mixed with sulfuric acid. The ethanol becomes ethene. (Does it become some sort of equilibrium situation there?). Now, the ethene is polymerized with FeCl3 and polyethylene appears "magically". These two reactions are easy to understand for me. What bugs me is the aftermath. If done in any glass-lab recipient, I can only imagine polyethylene would stick to it, rendering it useless for using it anytime else. So should these reactions be done in something disponsable, like a plastic bottle, for ensuring minimal costs?

BP of ethylene is -108oC
 
chemisttree said:
BP of ethylene is -108oC
Chemisttree subtly tries to tell me ethylene is a gas which could escape from an open recipient, and whoever tries to do these reactions should do it in something closed, or in any lab system capable of sending the ethylene, in gas state, to a disponsable bottle for polymerization.
Am I right?
 
Yep. Not the kind of reaction you do as a demonstration.
 
But...but the reactions...magic...nevermind, thanks for clearing this doubt.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...

Similar threads

Back
Top