Meaning of "A Good Analogy is like a Diagonal Frog"

  • Thread starter Thread starter fomenkoa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analogy
AI Thread Summary
Kai Krause's quote "A good analogy is like a diagonal frog" is perceived as a humorous and nonsensical statement rather than an oxymoron. The discussion suggests that the quote serves as a flippant joke about the nature of analogies, possibly implying that good analogies are as elusive as the concept of a diagonal frog, which doesn't exist. The humor lies in the irony of using a poor analogy to illustrate what a good analogy should be. While the quote has philosophical undertones, its primary intent appears to be comedic rather than a serious commentary on the effectiveness of analogies. The lack of clarity around its origin adds to its intrigue, with some interpretations suggesting it critiques the very concept of analogies.
fomenkoa
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I love Kai Krause's quote "A good analogy is like a diagonal frog"...to me it's one of those oxymorons...like "astronomically small" or "authentic replica"

Is that why it's so popular...because it's a clever oxymoron...or did this guy Kai Krause have another intent for the quote that I haven't come up with yet?

I tried searching the net for the meaning of the quote, but all it ever says online is that Kai Krause made it up...and that it has something to do with Philosophy which is why I put it in this section

I also noticed someone had a PhysicsForums "post signature" that was this quote..perhaps that person or somebody else knows?

Anton
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not an oxymoron. "Diagonal frog" just has several possible interpretations and doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Kai Krause is drawing a humorously bad analogy to describe a good analogy, for the purpose of irony. It could be interpreted as an argument against the effectiveness of analogies in general, but I think it's just a flippant joke.
 
Don't know anything about the origin or original context of the quote, I just happened to stumble upon it on the web one day. I agree, it's pretty witty.
 
I suppose it must mean that since diagonal frogs don't exist (or the idea is nonsense, or something like that), good analogies don't exist either.
 
I don't think it's meant to be a statement about actual analogies. My interpretation has always been that it's just meant to be humorous-- the author tries to give us an idea of what a good analogy is by using an analogy himself, but winds up writing an exceptionally bad/nonsensical one rather than a good one.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Back
Top