Why Does Traverse-Time Depend on n Being Odd or Even in Polar Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the traversal behavior of the polar function r=cos(n*θ) based on whether n is odd or even. When n is even, the function completes its traversal as θ ranges from 0 to 2π, resulting in 2n lobes, while for odd n, it traverses from 0 to π, yielding n lobes. This behavior is attributed to the sign of cos(nθ); when negative, r is interpreted as positive with an added π to θ, causing overlapping lobes in odd cases. The participants seek to understand this dependency and confirm that the function is fully traversed when r returns to its starting point. Examples of r=5cos(4θ) and r=5cos(5θ) are requested to illustrate these concepts.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
I have the function in polar coordinates r=cos(n*θ), where r is the radii. I'm supposed to draw the graph of this function, and calculate the area. But to calculate the area, I need to know how fast the function traverses. From the solution in my book, it says if n is even, the function traverses when θ goes from 0 to 2pi, and from 0 to pi if n is odd.

Why is the traverse-time for this function only dependant on if n is odd or even? I do not understand this at all. Can you guys help me develop an intuition for functions in polar coordinates?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You will cover one lobe as r goes from 0 to 1 and back to 0. That is, as n\theta goes form -\pi+ 2k\pi to \pi/2+ 2k\pi for integer k.

The reason for the "if n is even, the function traverses when θ goes from 0 to 2pi, and from 0 to pi if n is odd." is that when cos(n\theta) is negative, r is negative and, because r is alwas positive in polar coordinates, is interpreted as positive but with \pi added to \theta. When n is odd, that results in one lobe covering another. When n is even, there are 2n lobes, when n is odd there are n lobes.
 
So you're saying when r goes from 0 to 1 to 0 (and n*θ goes from -pi/2 to pi/2) the function has fully traversed?

Is this a general rule? That when r goes back to where it started, the function has traversed?

is that when cos(nθ) is negative, r is negative and, because r is alwas positive in polar coordinates, is interpreted as positive but with π added to θ. When n is odd, that results in one lobe covering another. When n is even, there are 2n lobes, when n is odd there are n lobes.
I think I get you, but can you please provide an example?
 
The first graph is r= 5cos(4\theta) and the second graph is r= 5cos(5\theta)
 

Attachments

  • rose.jpeg
    rose.jpeg
    13.5 KB · Views: 526
  • rose2.jpeg
    rose2.jpeg
    11.6 KB · Views: 507
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top