Using microscope for OPAQUE samples

  • Thread starter Thread starter refind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microscope
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on challenges faced when using an optical microscope to examine opaque samples due to inadequate lighting. The user describes difficulties in illuminating the sample as the microscope's lens arrangement blocks light from below, and attempts to use aluminum foil for reflection have failed. Suggestions include using a thinner or smaller sample to allow more light access and removing one eyepiece to shine light directly through the microscope. The conversation emphasizes the need for effective lighting solutions and possibly considering a different microscope for better results. Overall, achieving sufficient illumination is crucial for examining opaque samples effectively.
refind
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I have an optical microscope and some opaque samples that I want to examine the surface of. I drew up a picture of how the microscope is arranged (attached). There is a series of lenses on a rotating drum that are located underneath the stage where glass slides are placed. The lenses usually come very close to the glass, almost touching it.
I'm having a lot of trouble lighting up the surface of the sample I need to look at. There needs to be quite a bit of light in order to get any decent image, and there is no space underneath to shine light from below. I have an optical fiber illuminator (brand Fiberlite) and it's still too big to snake through underneath. The lenses usually block all the light.
I tried to put aluminum foil on the bottom of the glass slide and use it to reflect the light fom above but that failed too, there was simply not enough light. I'm stuck right now and need some help.

Any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • WP_000160.jpg
    WP_000160.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 540
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you get a thinner sample? Or a smaller one in general, to get more light from the sides? The aluminium foil is a nice approach, but it works best if the sample is smaller than the height of the glass (+- some factor of 2).
 
You can use any opaque surface that is small in size and can reflect the light. It may be a metal.
_________________
biobank information
 
If the microscope is binocular, try removing one eyepiece and shining your light source down that.

This worked for me the other day to give me reflected light when I only had transmitted to work with.

Otherwise, I think you might need to find a better microscope.
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top