Meaning of soulution of Central Equation: Nearly free electron model

mhsd91
Messages
22
Reaction score
4
Considering the Nearly Free Electron model of solids, where we assume the valence electrons of some one dimensional(!) solid to move in a weak, periodic (with respect to the solids lattice constant) potensial.

We may derive (which I assume you are familiare with, and will not do here) the central equation as an algebraic reformulation of the time independent Schrödinger eq. corresponding to the model/potential at hand,

<br /> (\lambda_k - \epsilon)C_k + \Sigma_G U_G C_{k-G} = 0<br />



where \lambda_k = (\hbar^2 k^2) / (2m_e), G is the set of possible reciprocal lattice vectors and C_k is det Fourier coefficients corresponding to the solution of the Schrödinger eq.:

<br /> \psi_k = \Sigma_k C_k e^{ikx}<br />.


My problem is that I do not understand what exactly we do find if we solve the central equation.

Say for instance I solve it and find the energy \epsilon_\pm = \lambda_k \pm U_0 for some k. Then I am told the energy gap, \epsilon_{gap} = \epsilon_+ - \epsilon_-, between two energy bands for this k at hand. Please (dis)confirm!?

... and then WHICH two bands are this gap between? (If that makes sense). And is it possible to find values for C_k, how? .. Assuming we know the periodicity of the potential and k.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mhsd91 said:
Considering the Nearly Free Electron model of solids, where we assume the valence electrons of some one dimensional(!) solid to move in a weak, periodic (with respect to the solids lattice constant) potensial.

We may derive (which I assume you are familiare with, and will not do here) the central equation as an algebraic reformulation of the time independent Schrödinger eq. corresponding to the model/potential at hand,

<br /> (\lambda_k - \epsilon)C_k + \Sigma_G U_G C_{k-G} = 0<br />



where \lambda_k = (\hbar^2 k^2) / (2m_e), G is the set of possible reciprocal lattice vectors and C_k is det Fourier coefficients corresponding to the solution of the Schrödinger eq.:

<br /> \psi_k = \Sigma_k C_k e^{ikx}<br />.


My problem is that I do not understand what exactly we do find if we solve the central equation.

Say for instance I solve it and find the energy \epsilon_\pm = \lambda_k \pm U_0 for some k. Then I am told the energy gap, \epsilon_{gap} = \epsilon_+ - \epsilon_-, between two energy bands for this k at hand. Please (dis)confirm!?

... and then WHICH two bands are this gap between? (If that makes sense). And is it possible to find values for C_k, how? .. Assuming we know the periodicity of the potential and k.

yes we can;
in this case C is equal to: +_sgn(U)C
u can find the exact equation in,Solid State Physics By Ashcroft&Mermin.chapter9,equation (9.29)-
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top