How sensitive are gieger counters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "trace radiation" as depicted in movies, particularly regarding its detection by devices like Geiger counters. Participants note that "trace" lacks a formal scientific definition and is context-dependent, often considered negligible amounts, potentially around 1/10 of EPA safe guidelines. Geiger counters vary in sensitivity based on manufacturer specifications and are not the sole means of radiation detection. The term "microCurie" (uCi) is explained, with 0.01 uCi equating to 370 Bq, a level detectable by Geiger counters. The conversation also references historical standards and guidelines established from past research and industry experiences, indicating that exposure to trace amounts is generally considered safe over a lifetime.
MathJakob
Messages
161
Reaction score
5
So obviously you've all watched a movie where some FBI dude shows up with a geiger counter and it's able to detect trace radiation on someone who has simply handled it in a briefcase or something. My question is polonium for example is found in many things including cigarettes so what is classed as a trace amount?

I'm seeing samples being sold with an alpha activity of 0.01uCi whatever that means. Would a Geiger counter be able to pick up such a small amount? Sorry if my question doesn't make sense or is a bit vague I'm just curios as to how true movies are when relating to real scenarios
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
"Trace" is whatever the TV shows says it is.
There is no formal, scientific, definition. It is a quantity which is "negligible" - so it depends on the context.
It would be reasonable for "trace radiation" to be 1/10 of the EPA safe guidelines... well below background.

Geiger counters are as sensitive as the manufacturer says it is.
They are not the only way to detect radiation.
uCi is "microCurie" - you can look up what it means.
For comparison - also look up the EPA guidelines: they are set so you'd need to be exposed for over a lifetime before you have a risk of getting sick off it.
You'll remember some fuss a while back over Texas drinking water?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
"Trace" is whatever the TV shows says it is.
There is no formal, scientific, definition. It is a quantity which is "negligible" - so it depends on the context.
It would be reasonable for "trace radiation" to be 1/10 of the EPA safe guidelines... well below background.

Geiger counters are as sensitive as the manufacturer says it is.
They are not the only way to detect radiation.
uCi is "microCurie" - you can look up what it means.
For comparison - also look up the EPA guidelines: they are set so you'd need to be exposed for over a lifetime before you have a risk of getting sick off it.
You'll remember some fuss a while back over Texas drinking water?


Thanks for the answers, and actually no I don't remember that fuss as I'm in the UK so my news is probably not your news :D
 
MathJakob said:
Thanks for the answers, and actually no I don't remember that fuss as I'm in the UK so my news is probably not your news :D
I'm in NZ and still managed to hear about it ;)

UK government has similar standards to ours - available from HSE. The standards are based on studies going back to the Curies groundbreaking research and arising later from industry experience such as the radium girls'.

As for what it means...
See the Rad FAQ for notes on comparing different measures - in case you are used to something else.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
MathJakob said:
I'm seeing samples being sold with an alpha activity of 0.01uCi whatever that means.

1 Ci corresponds to 3.7 10^10 Bq or decays per second. So 0.01 uCi is 370 Bq. That's easy to detect with a Geiger counter. In fact, a Geiger counter is a very sensitive device. However, you don't get any information on the type and energy of the radiation being detected from it.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top