Proving Odd Number of Real Roots in Cubic Equations

AI Thread Summary
A cubic equation always has at least one real root due to its odd degree. If there are additional real roots, they must be in odd numbers, specifically one or three, because any remaining roots must come in conjugate pairs if they are complex. The discussion highlights that while a cubic can have multiple real roots, the nature of polynomial equations ensures that the total count remains odd. Graphing cubic functions can provide further insight into their root behavior. Understanding these properties is essential for proving the odd number of real roots in cubic equations.
lmamaths
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

A cubic equation has at least one real root.
If it has more than one why are there always an
odd number of real roots? Why not an even number
of real roots?

Can someone help me to prove this?

Thx!
LMA
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because it has minimum one.In that case,if u factor that monom,u're left with a second order polynomial in "x" which has either 0 or 2 real roots...In total,the cubic has either 1 or 3 real roots.

Of course,the coefficients of the polynomials must be real.(in the other thread,too).

Daniel.
 
If you allow complex numbers, you can prove that if you have a solution to a polynomial with real coefficients, its complex conjugate will also be a solution.
That means a polynomial of odd degree always has a real root. Moreover, if you have nonreal root, then you always have another one (its complex conjugate).
 
Galileo: you can prove...its complex conjugate will also be a solution.
This is because F(x) = Real part + imaginary part. So that for the function to go to zero, BOTH the real and imaginary parts go to zero, and so by changing the sign on the imaginary part of x, the complex conjugate will also go to zero.

Einstein, before fleeing Germany, had already become a refugee from mathematics. He later said that he could not find, in that garden of many paths, the one to what was fundamental. He turned to the more earthly domain of physics, where the way to the essential was, he thought, clearer. His disdain for mathematics earned him the nickname "lazy dog" from his teacher, Hermann Minkowski, who would soon recast the "lazy dog's" special relativity into its characteristic four-dimensional form. "You know, once you start calculating," Einstein would quip, "you **** yourself up before you know it." http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?%20id=7ixqqc97xiroy9hnb9o2154f61c2wl02
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lmamaths said:
Hi,

A cubic equation has at least one real root.
If it has more than one why are there always an
odd number of real roots? Why not an even number
of real roots?

Can someone help me to prove this?

Thx!
LMA

If you play on the defintion of root, it can have an even number of real ones. For counterexample :

P(x)=(x-a)*(x-b)^2
 
Imamaths,

Graphing some functions of the form y = ax^3+bx^2+cx+d might help you to see what's going on.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top