EM wave - nodes at metal surface

AI Thread Summary
In a standing electromagnetic wave between two metal plates, nodes occur at the metal surfaces due to the infinite conductivity of the metal. The electric field inside the conductor is zero because any electric field induces charge movement that cancels the field almost instantaneously. At the surface, the electric field component parallel to the metal is zero, while the perpendicular component remains non-zero. Conversely, for the magnetic field, the normal component at the surface is zero, but the tangential component is not. This behavior aligns with the boundary conditions of electromagnetic fields at conductor surfaces.
Edgardo
Messages
706
Reaction score
17
I've read in a book, that if you had a standing electromagnetic wave between two metal plates, only nodes would be at the metal plates. This is due to the infinite high conduction of metal, the book says.

Why is that so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is one of the boundary conditions of an electric field at the surface of a conductor. Inside the conductor, the electric field will be zero since any electric field will cause the charges to move around as to cancel this field (practically instantaneously).
Same reasoning applies with the wave. Any E-field at the surface of the metal plate will cause the electrons to move around as to cancel this field. So it will always be zero.
 
So the E-field (and the B-field) at the surface is zero, since the electrons' movements cancel out the E-field? And the movement is so fast that it is really zero?
 
Yes, it is practically instantaneous. Mathematically it IS in the case of an ideal conductor.
Any field in, say, the x-direction will push on the charges and cause positive to accumulate x direction and negative charge in the -x direction. This arrangement will produce its own field in the -x direction as to cancel the original field, so the total field will be zero.
 
Last edited:
It is only the component of E parallel to the metal'surface that is zero. The component perpendicular to (and just outside) the surface is not zero. For B, it is the opposite. The normal component is zero and the tangential component is not. If the wave vector (k) is perpendicular to the surface, E at the surface is zero, but B is not.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top