Finding the beta risk from the alpha risk

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivGradCurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alpha Beta
AI Thread Summary
To find beta risk after determining alpha risk, one must first establish the critical value (zc) using the known alpha level and the distribution's mean and variance. Since the variances are assumed equal, the same variance can be applied to both the null and alternative distributions. By calculating the tail probability for the alternative distribution based on its mean and the shared variance, the beta risk (Type II error) can be derived. This approach allows for a mathematical understanding of the relationship between alpha and beta risks without predetermined values. Understanding this procedure is essential for accurately assessing the risk of incorrectly assuming equal variances.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I would like to know the procedure in order to find the beta risk once the hypothesis test has been made.

I am aware of the fact that it is efficient to set both alpha and beta prior to data collection, but, in this case, I was given the observations and an alpha value. I used the t-test to compare the means, and one of the requirements is to test the hypothesis that the variances are the same. From the information that I have, the p-values and F-values do not allow the rejection of the null, which makes it possible to pool the variances and calculate the t-statistic for the first hypothesis. I understand how the alpha and beta risks are pictorially represented and what they mean, but unfortunately I don't see how to get this.

The answer to this question would be useful; it would be possible to state the risk of having assumed equal variances.

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a critical value and a distribution (i.e. a mean and a variance) then you should be able to calculate both the "alpha" and the "beta" -- by which I am assuming you mean Type I and Type II errors. Can you explain a little?

Is this homework?
 
No. This is not homework. I'm using a computer program to analyze data. Just an alpha value (5%) was provided along with it. I am trying to find the procedure used to calculate the correspondent beta. Yes, alpha and beta stand for Type I and II errors, respectively. I can't just pick a value and say it is true. There must be some mathematical explanation (since the value was not predetermined).

Does this answer your question?
 
Since you know alpha, you know the critical value: given the location (mean) and the spread (variance) of the distribution, the "z" value that equates the tail probability to your alpha value is the critical value zc.
 
Since you know zc, all you have to do is to look at the other (alternative) distribution and calculate its tail probability, which would be the beta.

The other distribution is determined by the other (alternative) mean and the variance (since variances tested identical, you can assume the same variance for both distributions).
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top