Planck - stelactic - cosmological black hole symmetry?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of concentric black holes, specifically how a central stelactic black hole mediates a symmetry between Planck and cosmological black holes. It examines the implications of Hawking radiation and the gravitational inversion of event horizons, suggesting a duality among these black holes. Participants inquire about potential interrelationships beyond their classification as black holes and discuss the existence of a critical mass demarcation between stellar and galactic black holes. The conversation highlights the intriguing possibility that the observable universe's mass-radius ratio aligns with characteristics of black holes. Overall, the idea of nested black holes presents a compelling framework for understanding cosmic structures.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Like nested dolls, these black holes appear coexisting concentrically where the central stelactic (stellar-galactic) black hole mediates a symmetry between the other two.

For instance, consider how stelactic Hawking radiation manifests under inversion of its event horizon. The events within this horizon are, upon inversion, gravitationally-reversed (a la dark energy), with the Planck ("singularity") and cosmological ("Hubble") black holes exhibiting duality.

Can you see more significant interrelationships amongst them, other than they are black holes?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Is there a critical (mass) demarcation between stellar and galactic black holes, and how might this differentiation have arisen in the early universe?
 
Wow, concentric black holes, that is certainly news to me and is very exciting. Got a link please?
 
It just seems to make sense to me. The observable universe is on the order of the right mass-radius ratio to be a black hole, wherein exist "conventional" stelactic black holes whose central "singularities" themselves are of maximal density, perhaps a composite like that characteristic of Planck black holes.
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

A Black hole mass coupled to expansion -- astrophysical source of dark energy?
3
Replies
134
Views
10K
I DeSitter cosmological horizon stability?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Do particles leave behind an image when crossing cosmo event horizon?
Replies
14
Views
3K
B Could time move inside a black hole?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B What fraction of the matter in the universe is in black holes?
Replies
15
Views
3K
B The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology
Replies
45
Views
7K
B Units for Entropy of Simple Black Holes
Replies
3
Views
1K
I New Paper Claims Primordial Black Holes Don't Explain Dark Matter
Replies
20
Views
4K
B Black hole evaporation mechanism
Replies
4
Views
1K
What is the limit of classical GR in describing the singularity of a black hole?
Replies
9
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top