Chemical Kinetics - Rate Laws and Mechanisms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemical kinetics problem involving the reaction of nitrogen monoxide (NO) and bromine (Br2) to form nitrosyl bromide (NOBr). The established rate law is Rate = k[NO]^2[Br2], with the rate constant calculated as k = 1.2e4 L^2 mol^-2 s^-1. For part (c), it is clarified that the concentration of NO remaining when half of Br2 is consumed is 0.02 mol/L, based on stoichiometry rather than kinetics. In part (d), the correct reaction mechanism is identified as the first option, emphasizing that the rate law reflects the slowest step in the reaction sequence. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of stoichiometry and reaction mechanisms in determining reaction rates.
kazimmerman
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is straight off an old AP Exam, but I can't seem to find it online so I'm hoping you all can help me out.

2 NO(g) + Br2(g) --> 2 NOBr(g)
The following results were obtained in experiments designed to study the rate of the reaction above.
Experiment Initial Concentration (mol/L) Initial Rate of Appearance of NOBr(M/sec)
[NO] [Br2]
1 0.02 0.02 9.6e-2
2 0.04 0.02 3.8e-1
3 0.02 0.04 1.9e-1

(I'm not sure how to correctly display tables, so hopefully you can understand what everything is.

a) Write the rate law for the reaction.
b) Calculate the value of the rate constant, k, for the reaction. Include units.
c) In experiment 2, what was the concentration of NO remaining when half of the original amount of Br2 was consumed?
d) Which of the following reaction mechanisms is consistent with the rate law established in (a)? Explain your choice.
I. NO + NO --> N2O2 (fast)
N2O2 + Br2 --> 2 NOBr (slow)
II. Br2 --> Br + Br (slow)
2 (NO + Br --> NOBr) (fast)

Homework Equations



Rate = k[A]^n^m

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I've figured this out and I know I am correct with the following rate law:
Rate = k[NO]^2[Br2]
b) I also have this one confirmed correct:
k = 1.2e4 L^2 mol^-2 s-1
c) This is where my problems begin. I am sure I should probably be splitting the rate law and using integrated rate laws and/or half-life equations, but I'm not completely sure where to begin. I know for second-order rates, half-life is:
t = (k[A](initial))^-1
and for a first-order reaction:
t = ln(2) k^-1
d) I understand mechanisms a bit, but I guess I don't know how to differentiate between which should occur.

Thanks ahead of time for any help. ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) and (b) look good.

For (c), you do not need to use any of the kinetics - only the stoichiometry of the balanced equation. Translating the equation into words: for every mole of Br2 consumed, there are 2 moles of NO consumed. This should lead you to the answer for (c).

(d) As far as mechanisms are concerned, a key point is that the overall rate is largely determined by the slowest step among a series of sequential steps that constitute the overall reaction. So, the essentials of the overall rate law should be extractable from the slow step.
 
So, for (c), wouldn't it also be half of the initial concentration of NO, .02?

And, as far as (d) goes, I know that choice I is correct, but I just don't understand why.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top