Solving Momentum and Energy Equations for Elastic Collision | Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter vorcil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving equations related to momentum and energy conservation in the context of an elastic collision. Participants are attempting to work through simultaneous equations derived from these principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the setup of conservation equations for momentum and kinetic energy, expressing uncertainty about solving the resulting simultaneous equations. There are attempts to isolate variables and substitute them into other equations, with some participants questioning their own calculations and the correctness of their approaches.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on how to manipulate the equations, particularly in isolating variables. There is ongoing exploration of different interpretations of the equations and the solutions derived from them, with no clear consensus on the correct answers yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express frustration over their calculations and the complexity of the problem, indicating a potential lack of clarity in the setup or assumptions made in the equations. There are references to specific numerical values and results that participants believe may be incorrect.

vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
i used the conservation of momentum equation and conservation of energy equation

got m1.v1i + m2.v2i = m1.v1f + m2.v2f
and 1/2 m1 . v1i^2 + 1/2m2 . v2i^2 = 1/2 m1.v1f^2+ 1/2 m2.v2f^2

i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

(this is for the elastic one)

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/2373/masteringphysics.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i used the conservation of momentum equation and conservation of energy equation

got m1.v1i + m2.v2i = m1.v1f + m2.v2f
and 1/2 m1 . v1i^2 + 1/2m2 . v2i^2 = 1/2 m1.v1f^2+ 1/2 m2.v2f^2

i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

(this is for the elastic one)
 
anyone please?
 
vorcil said:
i know it's a simutaneous equation but i don't know how to solve it!

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2
One way is to solve for y (in terms of x) in equation 1 and substitute that into equation 2. Then you'll have an equation with one unknown, which you can solve.
 
i got it wrong!
can someone show me how to do it please!

i solved Vf1 to be 3.153 ms^-1
vf2 to be 0.205 ms^-1

for the elastic collision
 
vorcil said:
i got it wrong!
Show exactly what you did. Start by showing how you solved for y in terms of x in the first equation.
 
Doc Al said:
Show exactly what you did. Start by showing how you solved for y in terms of x in the first equation.

1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
5.5 + 0 = 0.55x^2 + .15y^2

5.5 = (0.55*x^2) + (0.15*((1.1-(0.11*x)-0.3)^2))
solving for x i got 3.15

y = 1.1 - (.11*x) -.3

y = .45

thanks for helping
 
vorcil said:
1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
...
y = 1.1 - (.11*x) -.3
Correct this.
 
vorcil said:
omg lol i don't believe it

dude i still got the wrong awnser

is it y = 1.1 / ((0.11x)+0.3)
y = (1.1 + (0.11x)) /0.3?

i don't know what the hell is wrong with me this morning, it's 3 am now
 
  • #10
vorcil said:
dude i still got the wrong awnser

is it y = 1.1 / ((0.11x)+0.3)
y = (1.1 + (0.11x)) /0.3?
Not quite (almost). Try again.
vorcil said:
1.1 + 0 = 0.11 x + 0.3y
Solve this for y. Do it slowly, one step at a time.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Not quite (almost). Try again.

Solve this for y. Do it slowly, one step at a time.

y = ( 1.1 - ( 0.11*X) ) / 0.3

i'm on my last try for this question, it's like high school all over again
just want to check with you before i go for my final attempt

5.5 = (0.55 * X^2) + (0.15 * ( ( ( 1.1 - (0.11*X ) ) / 0.3 ) ^2 ) )
 
  • #12
vorcil said:
y = ( 1.1 - ( 0.11*X) ) / 0.3
That's more like it.
 
  • #13
Doc Al said:
That's more like it.

I still managed to get it wrong,

V1f=2.85
V2f=2.62

2.85 was from the solved equation from above,
and v2f = (1.1-(.11*2.85))/0.3
 
  • #14
vorcil said:
I still managed to get it wrong,

V1f=2.85
V2f=2.62

2.85 was from the solved equation from above,
and v2f = (1.1-(.11*2.85))/0.3
When you solve a quadratic equation you get two solutions. Often, only one of the solutions will be physically realistic for a given problem. That's the case here. (Note that the solution that you chose has the first mass moving faster than the second, but in the same direction. How could that be possible unless the masses passed through each other?)

What's the other solution?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K