Understanding the Movement of a Sphere on a Frictionless Surface

AI Thread Summary
When a force is applied to a string attached to the top of a sphere on a frictionless surface, the sphere will both rotate and translate. If the force does not pass through the center of mass, it will create torque, causing the sphere to rotate. The translational movement occurs simultaneously, and the force acting on the center of mass is equivalent to the force applied at the top of the sphere. This scenario can be likened to a sphere floating in space, emphasizing the effects of applied forces. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing motion in frictionless environments.
mbrown3391
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
http://cheeseparade.com/diagram.png

Imagine a sphere on a frictionless surface. A string is attached to the top of the sphere, as shown. If a force is applied to the string, how will the sphere move? Will there be any torque at all, even though there is no friction? Or will the sphere move in exactly the same way as if the string was attached to the side of the sphere?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mbrown3391 said:
Will there be any torque at all, even though there is no friction?
Sure. Your scenario is equivalent to a sphere floating in space. If the force doesn't go through the center of mass, it will start rotating.
 
Ok, that's what i figured. But will there be translational movement as well? If so, how can you describe the force that acts on the center of mass as a function of the force that acts at the top of the sphere?
 
mbrown3391 said:
But will there be translational movement as well?
Yes
mbrown3391 said:
If so, how can you describe the force that acts on the center of mass as a function of the force that acts at the top of the sphere?
They are the same
 
Ok, thanks for you help!
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top