Jacobian transformation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the transformation of a complex integral involving variables α and β into a new form with variables x and y using a Jacobian transformation. The original integral is expressed in terms of α and β, while the transformed integral uses the substitutions α = xy and β = x(1-y). The user struggles with correctly applying the Jacobian to change the variables and integrate, as their attempts lead to a complicated expression rather than the desired result. They seek clarification on the proper method for performing this transformation. The thread highlights the importance of understanding Jacobian transformations in multivariable integrals.
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I feel so stupid for asking this question, but I want to understand how this integral:

\int^{\infty}_{0}d\alpha \int^{\infty}_{0} d\beta \frac{i}{[4 \pi i(\alpha + \beta)]^\frac{D}{2}} e^{[i \frac{\alpha\beta}{\alpha + \beta}p^2 - i(\alpha + \beta)m^2]}

can be transformed into this:

\int^{\infty}_{0}dx \int^{1}_{0} dy \frac{1}{[4 \pi i x]^\frac{D}{2}} e^{[-i x (m^2 -y(1-y)p^2)}

The change of variables are:

\alpha =xy
\beta = x(1-y)

My question is both these equations are in terms of two variables and I have never come across how to do this kind of integral. I am guessing that we just to substitute:

d\alpha =xdy+ydx

and

d\beta = (1-y)dx -xdy

into the original integral.

However, if I do this, I don't get the second expression... I get something quite messy.

Can anyone shed any light on this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma2001/notes/node77.html

The above (Jacobian transformation) describes how the transformation is supposed to take place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


thanks mathman:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top