Could this happen? Proton-Antineutron Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
A collision between a proton and an antineutron can lead to interactions where quarks from each particle combine, potentially forming a particle composed of an up quark and a down antiquark. This resulting particle is identified as a positively charged pion (π^+), which can indeed be created during such a collision. However, the pion is not stable and will decay into other particles, such as a positive muon or a positron, along with gamma radiation. The decay process continues, ultimately producing neutrinos that remain in the system. Overall, the collision results in significant energy release and the creation of various particles.
Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
OK, let's say we had a proton and an antineutron. The proton, I believe, is composed of two up quarks and a down quark. The antineutron is probably composed of two down antiquarks and one up antiquark. My question is, if these were to collide, would one down quark from the proton collide with one down antiquark from the neutron, and one up quark from the proton would collide with one up antiquark from the neutron, creating a particle composed of an up quark and a down antiquark? So, I guess I have three questions:

1. Would a collision work like I stated above?
2. Would an up-quark down-antiquark particle be made?
3. Would such a particle be stable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Yes, but also a ton of energy will be released, so new quarks/anti-quarks can be produced, allowing for different combinations of products than you stated. In fact, you may end up with quarks other than up/down and their anti-particles.

2) It could be. This meson is called a pion. There are 3 different pions, and this is the positively charged one, \pi^+.

3) No, it is not stable. It will decay into either a positive muon or a positron + corresponding anti-neutrino and some gamma radiation. Muon will subsequently decay as well, most likely into positron, muon neutrino, and anti-neutrino, also releasing energy. A positron will eventually annihilate with an ambient electron producing gamma radiation.

Note that in all possible scenarios, you do end up with loose neutrinos that don't disappear.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top