How Does a Longer Crumple Zone Affect Impact Duration and Passenger Safety?

  • Thread starter Thread starter milkyway11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
A longer crumple zone in a car can increase the duration of impact, which affects passenger safety by reducing the force experienced during a collision. In the scenario presented, a car weighing 1980 kg collides with a wall at 13 m/s, resulting in a force of 3217.5 N upon impact. The method to find the new model's acceleration using F=ma and kinematics is confirmed to be correct, leading to an increased impact duration of 8 seconds. The impulse on the car and its passengers remains unchanged, as it is determined by the initial momentum of the vehicle. Overall, the discussions affirm that longer crumple zones enhance safety without altering the impulse experienced.
milkyway11
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
question states: a 1980 kg car moving at 13 m/s is brought to a stop in 2 seconds when it collides with a wall. if a new model of this car has a longer crumple zone, the passengers experience a 3217.5 N force upon impact. by what percentage has the period of impact been increased? has the impulse on the car and its passengers changed.

my attempt at this problem is to find the new model's acceleration by use F=ma, then use the kinematics Vf=Vo+at to find the period to be 8 sec. Then I can calculate the percentage by dividing the difference with the original period. But this somehow seemed to easy and I am not sure if it's right. Also, I would assume the impulse doesn't change since P=mv, but I am not sure on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi milkyway11! welcome to pf! :wink:

yes, your method looks fine (and yes, the impulse doesn't change) :smile:
 


Thank you!

tiny-tim said:
hi milkyway11! welcome to pf! :wink:

yes, your method looks fine (and yes, the impulse doesn't change) :smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top