Doppler effect of light source

mananvpanchal
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
A source and a receiver is at rest with each other. Source emits some couple of light pulses, and stops emitting more.

1. The pulses is not reached to the receiver yet, and source starts moving. Does the receiver experience doppler effect with the emitted pulses?

2. The pulses is not reached to the receiver yet, and receiver starts moving. Does the receiver experience doppler effect with the emitted pulses?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer to both questions is "no." After the pulses have left the source, their propagation (relative to a receiver, or indeed relative to any inertial reference frame) is not affected by later changes in the motion of the source.

The same applies to baseballs, or cricket balls if you prefer. :smile:
 
mananvpanchal said:
A source and a receiver is at rest with each other. Source emits some couple of light pulses, and stops emitting more.

1. The pulses is not reached to the receiver yet, and source starts moving. Does the receiver experience doppler effect with the emitted pulses?
No.
mananvpanchal said:
2. The pulses is not reached to the receiver yet, and receiver starts moving. Does the receiver experience doppler effect with the emitted pulses
Yes, if he moves toward or away from the source. If he moves at a right angle so his distance from the original location of the source remains constant, then no. EDIT: actually, it is more complicated than this as he has to take a specific path for there to be no Doppler.
mananvpanchal said:
Thanks.
 
Last edited:
ghwellsjr said:
No.

Yes, if he moves toward or away from the source. If he moves at a right angle so his distance from the original location of the source remains constant, then no.

Thanks ghwellsjr.
 
jtbell said:
The answer to both questions is "no." After the pulses have left the source, their propagation (relative to a receiver, or indeed relative to any inertial reference frame) is not affected by later changes in the motion of the source.

I'm sorry, I misread the second question, because the two are so similar. The answer to that question is "yes." However, the amount of doppler shift perceived by the receiver does not depend on whether the source has changed its motion after emitting the pulses; this is what my original "no" was intended to convey, which does not answer the question that was actually asked.
 
jtbell said:
I'm sorry, I misread the second question, because the two are so similar. The answer to that question is "yes." However, the amount of doppler shift perceived by the receiver does not depend on whether the source has changed its motion after emitting the pulses; this is what my original "no" was intended to convey, which does not answer the question that was actually asked.

That's ok, jtbell. Thanks.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top