What is the relationship between light rays and the equations of motion in GR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lalbatros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Light Rays
lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
Hello,

Would you know a reference showing and deriving the equations of light rays in GR.
I would like to read that as well as to compare that to the equations of motion of test particles in a gravitaional field.

Thanks,

Michel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lalbatros, how is this?
 
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.
 
Naty1 said:
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.

Although this may be true as a theoretical limit, any such deviation is so tiny that I don't know of any way for it to have a measurable effect in our universe. We know for example that photons with a wide range of energies from a distant supernova arrive with indistinguishable speed and direction, and even when there is some variation in propagation of photons, it is clearly due to (electromagnetic) interactions with other matter in space rather than gravitational effects.

The normal assumption in GR is that anything whose gravitational effect is negligible compared with that of the source of the field can be treated as a test particle. If you compare the energy of a typical photon with that of a typical gravitational source it should be obvious that this assumption holds in such cases by many orders of magnitude.
 
Naty1 said:
Idealized test particles, with no effect on an ambient gravitational field, follow null geodesics...actual light, that is photons, have some energy, so in fact they deviate slightly from geodesics in the real world...so a more energetic photon will follow a slightly different path than a low energy photon.
As Jonathan said, any such effect would be extremely difficult to detect. Additionally the equivalence principle suggests that locally and ignoring tidal effects that photons of all energies follow identical paths, because in the reference frame of a free falling lab, all photons from the same location follow an identical straight path no matter what their energy is.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top