Partial trace of density matrix

climbon
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I am unsure how to (mathematically) do the partial trace of a density matrix so that I can find the expectation value of an observable.

I am working on a model similar to the Jaynes cummings model. My density matrix is of the form;

<br /> \rho = [\rho_{11}, \rho_{12}, \rho_{21}, \rho_{22}]<br />

As a 2x2 matrix. My system is a composite system as;

<br /> H_{A} \otimes H_{B}<br />

I want to find the partial trace over the field so I can use an observable M to find the population inversion of the atom;

<br /> \rho^{A}(t) = Tr_{F}\rho(t)<br />

That way I can;

<br /> Tr(M \bullet \rho^{A})<br />

To find the inversion of the atom.

How do i do the trace over the field...I understand the principle but struggling how to do this mathematically??

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
!The partial trace of a density matrix is a mathematical operation that allows us to trace out one subsystem from a composite system. To do this mathematically, you need to use the definition of the trace operation: Tr(A) = Σi Ai,i Where A is an NxN matrix and Ai,i is the ith diagonal element of A. In the case of a 2x2 density matrix, you can calculate the partial trace over one subsystem (let's say B for simplicity) by summing all the elements in the diagonal of the matrix: Tr_B(ρ) = Σi ρii where ρii is the ith diagonal element of ρ.Once you have calculated the partial trace, you can then use it to calculate the expectation value of an observable M: <M> = Tr(M ρ) Where M is your observable and ρ is the density matrix.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top