Why are all non-principal sagittal rays considered skew?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThereIam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Ray
AI Thread Summary
Non-principal sagittal rays are classified as skew rays because they do not propagate within a plane that includes both the object point and the optical axis, meaning they do not intersect the optical axis. The meridional plane, defined by the optical system's axis, contains meridional rays, while skew rays leave this plane. In symmetric optical systems, even though the meridional plane remains constant, skew rays are essential for understanding aberrations like coma. The sagittal plane, where sagittal rays focus, varies at each optical surface, complicating the discussion. This distinction is crucial for understanding optical behavior and aberrations in various systems.
ThereIam
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
According to Wikipedia:

A sagittal ray or transverse ray from an off-axis object point is a ray that propagates in the plane that is perpendicular to the meridional plane and contains the principal ray.[3] Saggital rays intersect the pupil along a line that is perpendicular to the meridional plane for the ray's object point and passes through the optical axis. If the axis direction is defined to be the z axis, and the meridional plane is the y-z plane, saggital rays intersect the pupil at yp=0. The principal ray is both sagittal and meridional.[3] All other sagittal rays are skew rays.

A skew ray is a ray that does not propagate in a plane that contains both the object point and the optical axis. Such rays do not cross the optical axis anywhere, and are not parallel to it.[3]

The part I don't understand is why all rays that are sagittal rays that are not the chief/principal rays must be skew. Do they just mean all other rays originating from the same object point must be skew? Because that makes sense. Are these things always discussed with respect to a particular object point...? Now that I've written that, it seems obvious, but can someone please confirm?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also struggle to remember all this correctly- Kingslake's book is essential for this information.

First, the meridional plane: this one is straightforward to define, and remains constant for a rotationally symmetric optical system: if the axis of symmetry is 'z', the y-z plane is the conventional choice. Meridional rays always lie within this plane. Skew rays leave the meridional plane and never intersect the 'z' axis. Most optical diagrams are of the meridional plane, with meridional rays.

Even symmetric optical systems have asymmetric aberrations- coma, for example. Understanding the origin of comatic/asymmetric aberrations require use of skew rays, and conventionally, the skew rays located in a plane perpendicular to the meridional plane that also contains the principal ray are referred to as 'sagittal rays'. The complication is that the sagittal plane is not a constant throughout the optical system, but changes its tilt at each optical surface.

To some degree, this is somewhat more clear when discussing astigmatism- meridional rays come to focus on a sagittal plane, while sagittal rays come to focus on a meridional plane.

Does this help?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
8K
Back
Top