Is There a Way to Reverse Substitution in Finding Zeroes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pierce15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding intersections between the complex functions f(z)=e^z and g(z)=z, leading to the equation e^z=z. A substitution reveals that z=ln(z), allowing the equation to be rewritten as e^z=ln(z). The user is puzzled about reversing this substitution to find zeroes of the function i(z)=e^z-ln(z) back to h(z)=e^z-z. The conversation highlights the connection to the Lambert W function and emphasizes that there is no real number solution for the original equation e^z=z. The user ultimately seeks clarity on the concept of reverse substitution in this context.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hi guys... I'm probably missing something pretty basic here but I can't seem to figure this out. I was working on a problem recently: for the complex functions f(z)=ez and g(z)=z, find their intersections. This post is not about the problem, it is about something I noticed while tackling it (incorrectly).

Anyways, here's what I noticed: If you set these functions equal to each other, you get

ez=z

So, naturally:

z=ln(z)

From here I saw that a basic substitution was applicable, so the equation can be rewritten:

ez=ln(z)

Basically, what I have shown is that the function h(z)=ez-z has the same zeroes as the function i(z)=ez-ln(z). Now here's what's troubling me: what if the original problem that I gave you was to find the zeroes of i(z)? Originally, we obtained i(z) from h(z) by using a substitution, but is there some way that we can go in reverse from i(z) to h(z) using a "reverse substitution"? I'm sorry if this is rather unclear. Is there anything fundamental that I am missing?

Thanks a lot
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can do, pretty much any whacky thing you want because everything you do starts from the assumption that z is a real number such that e^z= z and there is NO such number.

Note that we are working with complex functions. By the way, I did find an answer to this problem, right now I am just thinking about reversing the substitution
 
pwsnafu said:
This is related to the Lambert W function.

pwnsnafu, like I said, I already solved the equation using the labert w function. Please read my first post carefully.
 
I guess this is kind of unclear. Here is the problem stated more clearly:

Prove that the system of f(z)=ez and g(z)=ln(z) has the same solutions as the system of f(z)=ez and h(z)=z
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top