Balancing forces on a bicycle wheel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the forces acting on a stationary bicycle wheel on an incline. The weight of the bicycle acts through the center of the wheel, and friction opposes the weight's component along the incline. Newton's third law is highlighted, indicating that the brake force applied to the wheel generates an equal and opposite reaction force. The participant seeks to understand how to balance these forces, noting that the wheel's torque must be countered by the brake's torque. Ultimately, the forces acting on the wheel must be balanced for the bicycle to remain stationary on the incline.
peanutaxis
Messages
25
Reaction score
3
Hi, (this is not a homework question)

If I have a bicycle with COM, M (in line with the center of the wheels, C) on an incline, angle Φ, and the bicycle is NOT moving at all because the brake is on at B.

I am trying to put in the forces acting on the wheel. I figure that the weight of the bicycle is probably acting through the center of the wheel because the COM is at the same height (would this change if the COM was in a different place?). And because the wheel is not moving laterally I figure the friction force is opposing the weight, but acting at ground level.

The brake is preventing the wheel from turning CCW, and so I think the ?? force from the brake needs to also be mgsinΦ in a CW direction. But the problem is that if I put the brake/?? force in, the static/overall forces on the wheel won't balance and the wheel should move off in the direction of the ?? force.

Help!?
thanks

jfz0bp.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
peanutaxis said:
I figure that the weight of the bicycle is probably acting through the center of the wheel because the COM is at the same height (would this change if the COM was in a different place?). And because the wheel is not moving laterally I figure the friction force is opposing the weight, but acting at ground level.
First of all, force from the frame is acting on center, right. That's property of the axis, so it will not change even if CoM is higher/lower.

You are also correct that the friction will be equal to weight's projection along the incline. No problem there.

What you are forgetting about is Newton's 3rd Law for the brake. If brake is applying force on wheel, wheel is applying force back on the brake. That force would accelerate the bike backwards if it weren't attached to the wheel. So rather than just bike's weight, front wheel experiences bike's weight plus the reaction force of the brake through it's center.

Now you can balance the tangential forces. Keep in mind that you also have normal forces on the wheel, and that normal force on the two wheels together adds up to component of weight perpendicular to the incline.
 
K^2 said:
What you are forgetting about is Newton's 3rd Law for the brake. If brake is applying force on wheel, wheel is applying force back on the brake.

But the whole thing is stationary, so Newton's 3rd applies to everything! So that doesn't help me: The wheel is pushing on the ground equally and opposite to the Friction force pushing on the wheel, and the wheel is pulling on the bicycle mass equally and opposite to the bicycle mass pulling on the wheel.

What I am trying to do is find the forces acting on the wheel.
The wheel is not moving laterally, so the friction force must be opposed equally by the bicycle weight.
The wheel is not rotating, so the torque due to the friction and the weight force must be opposed equally by the torque from the brake? How do you work these out?


thanks,
p
 
The component of the bike's weight perpendicular to the ground is balanced by force of the Earth on the wheels. Since the bike is on slanted ground there is also a component of weight parallel to the ground. That will be balanced by the friction force on the wheels which is transmitted to the brakes that prevent the wheels from turning.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top