How do you measure Electromagnetic wavelength?

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) waves have a wavelength that can be measured by analyzing the oscillation of their electric and magnetic fields, rather than visualizing them as particles with size. Photons, which are quantized interactions of EM waves, do not occupy space or have a defined size, as they are bosons that can exist in the same location. The wavelength is defined by the distance between crests or troughs in the wave's oscillation. A practical method to measure wavelength involves using interference patterns from two identical EM wave sources, where the difference in distance from the sources to a detector indicates the wavelength. Understanding these concepts clarifies the nature of EM waves and photons in physics.
g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
As we know EM waves have a wave length. Well, how do you measure them? I have the feeling there is a path from point A to point B and that path goes up and down at a regular rate and all photons travel along that wave-path and that they are no where else between A and B but on that path. But that view I have a feeling is incorrect. I think it's more probable that the photon occupies a probability space and that the line a photon is almost never here is a bit arbitrary and that is the length of the EM wave.

Also, I want to double check. I looked at wiki and I saw that the size of a photon is not listed prominently. Is that because they are bosons and can occupy the same space? If they can occupy the same space, then you can't measure their size.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, forget everything you think you know about photons. It is wrong.
A photon is the quantized interaction of an electromagnetic wave. They do not have a size. They are not particles with mass that occupy space.

As for an EM wave, the wavelength is talking about how far the wave travels during one oscillation of its electric and magnetic field vectors. There is nothing moving up and down. The little squiggly lines you see representing photons is utterly incorrect. The EM wave travels outwards like ripples on the surface of a pond, only in three dimensions, not two. If you were to measure the EM wave as it travels, you could graph the changing electric and magnetic fields on a graph. This is what you normally see when you look at anything that shows a photon or an EM wave. The distance between any crest or trough is the wavelength.
 
Thanks.
 
The simplest way to do it is by measuring interference patterns. Suppose that you have two identical sources of EM waves placed at a distance L between them.
Put your detector at some equidistant point from the two detectors . It will start ringing like crazy!
Then shift it aside , so that the distance from source 1 is r1 and from source 2 is r2.
When it starts ringing again like before , the difference between r1,r2 will be equal to the wavelength.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top