I don't understand why -1/2 is the higher energy level and +1/2 is the

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the energy levels of spin states -1/2 and +1/2 in a magnetic field. It is clarified that when the magnetic moment and external magnetic field oppose each other, the energy level is indeed higher, which aligns with classical magnet behavior. Conversely, when they are aligned, the energy level is lower. The text does not adequately explain this concept, leading to the inquiry for clarification. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the behavior of particles in magnetic fields.
duggielanger
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This question is off my forum , and I was just wondering if anybody could help.

I don't understand why -1/2 is the higher energy level and +1/2 is the lower energy level.

For spin state -1/2, if the external magentic field B0 and magnetic moment uZ oppose each other, surely the energy level will be lower?

Likewise for spin state +1/2: if the external magentic field B0 and magnetic moment uZ are parallel with each other, surely the energy level will be higher?

My main moan is that there doesn't appear to be anything in the text explaining why spin state -1/2 has a higher energy than that of +1/2...

Can anyone help?

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If the fields oppose each other, the energy is higher. This is similar to classical magnets: If you try to hold a magnet in the "wrong" direction, it tries to turn around.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top