BMR and adaptive thermogenesis: what's the 'norm'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aymeric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
AI Thread Summary
Adaptive thermogenesis can lead to a decrease in basal metabolic rate (BMR) during restrictive diets, prompting the body to use fewer nutrients by slowing down metabolic processes rather than reducing nutrient utilization for the same tasks. This slowdown affects functions like tissue repair and anabolism. The discussion raises the idea that a lowered BMR, often referred to as 'starvation mode,' might represent a more natural state for the body compared to the higher BMRs seen in populations with abundant food access. This perspective suggests that the current average BMRs could be artificially elevated due to modern dietary conditions, potentially indicating that the body is designed to function optimally on fewer nutrients.
Aymeric
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've often read that average BMR can decrease as a result of a restrictive diet, in a process known as adaptive thermogenesis.

What I haven't been able to find out though, is how exactly the body manages to 'use fewer nutrients' for the same tasks. Are sacrifices made anywhere? Are those sacrifices detrimental to general health?

Which raises the question of whether an 'adapted' (i.e. lowered, 'starvation-mode') BMR is not actually the normal BMR that we are supposed to have, as opposed to the current average BMRs that we witness in today's population because of the world of plenty we now live in. Aren't those BMRs possibly much higher than what the human body is made for? To me, this is what our ability to function properly on fewer nutrients would suggest...

Thanks in advance...
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I wouldn't say that the body uses fewer nutrients for the same tasks. I would say that they body slows down the rate at which those tasks occur. Tissue repair and anabolism in general would merely slow down.
 
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom

Similar threads

Back
Top