Why Do These Math Paradoxes Seem to Defy Logic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicoRaj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Reason
AI Thread Summary
Math paradoxes often arise from manipulating equations that involve division by zero, which is undefined. In the first example, the assumption that a equals b leads to a division by zero when simplifying, resulting in the erroneous conclusion that 1 equals 2. Similarly, in the second example, the expression (100-100)/(100-100) simplifies to 0/0, which is also an undefined operation. Both cases illustrate how logical fallacies can emerge from improper mathematical operations. Understanding the limitations of algebraic manipulation is crucial to avoiding these paradoxes.
PhysicoRaj
Gold Member
Messages
538
Reaction score
49
I'm sure there must be some explanation to why these kind of things appear..

firstly,
consider a=b
ab=b2
a2-ab=a2-b2
a(a-b)=(a+b)(a-b)
a=a+b
since a=b,
b=b+b
1=2 !??


then this one-
(100-100)/(100-100)
=[(10+10)(10-10)/10(10-10)]
=2

Anything has gone wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
PhysicoRaj said:
I'm sure there must be some explanation to why these kind of things appear..

firstly,
consider a=b
ab=b2
a2-ab=a2-b2
a(a-b)=(a+b)(a-b)
a=a+b
Since a = b, then a - b = 0. To get to the line above, you divided by zero, which is never allowed.
PhysicoRaj said:
since a=b,
b=b+b
1=2 !??


then this one-
(100-100)/(100-100)
=[(10+10)(10-10)/10(10-10)]
=2

Anything has gone wrong?
Here you canceled (10 - 10)/(10 - 10), which is 0/0. You can't do that.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
518
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top