Understanding Power Drain in Series and Parallel Circuits | MCAT Prep Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter PStudent111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuits Power
AI Thread Summary
In series circuits, a larger resistor dissipates more power than a smaller one, assuming constant current. In parallel circuits, smaller resistors dissipate more power due to their lower resistance. When comparing circuits with the same voltage source, the one with smaller equivalent resistance will drain more power. However, if resistance is excessively high, current may drop significantly, leading to minimal power dissipation. Understanding these principles through calculations and circuit diagrams can clarify the concepts of power dissipation in different configurations.
PStudent111
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Alright, so, is my thinking correct in that:

1. Within a series circuit, a larger resistor will drain more power than a smaller resistor.
2. Within a parallel circuit, a smaller resistor will drain more power than a larger resistor.
3. Between two circuits, each with the same voltage source, the one with a smaller equivalent resistance will drain more power.

I'm doing some MCAT prep and for some reason the power drain concept is difficult for me but I've think I've got the hang of it now.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi PStudent111! :smile:

Yes.

The easy way to check this is …
PStudent111 said:
1. Within a series circuit, a larger resistor will drain more power than a smaller resistor.
2. Within a parallel circuit, a smaller resistor will drain more power than a larger resistor.
3. Between two circuits, each with the same voltage source, the one with a smaller equivalent resistance will drain more power.

For 1, the current (I) is the same, so you use P = IV = I2R, which is proportional to R.

For 2 and 3, the voltage (V) is the same, so you use P = IV = V2/R, which is inversely proportional to R. :wink:
 
1. Within a series circuit, a larger resistor will drain more power than a smaller resistor.

Not necessarily. This is only true if something in the circuit maintains the same current when the resistance is changed.

For example suppose you changed the resistor to one with an exceptionally high resistance, Let's say you replaced it with a 1m air gap. Virtually no current would flow through the 1m air gap so the power loss would approach zero. However no power would be delivered to the load either so it wouldn't be a very useful circuit.

Instead of using the word "drain" it might be better to use the word "dissipate".
 
CWatters said:
Not necessarily. This is only true if something in the circuit maintains the same current when the resistance is changed.

For example suppose you changed the resistor to one with an exceptionally high resistance, Let's say you replaced it with a 1m air gap. Virtually no current would flow through the 1m air gap so the power loss would approach zero. However no power would be delivered to the load either so it wouldn't be a very useful circuit.

Instead of using the word "drain" it might be better to use the word "dissipate".

I think the OP means that there are 2 resistors in series. In such a case the current will be the same through both resistors and the one with a higher resistance will dissipate more power.
 
Perhaps. He did say "a larger" rather than "the larger".
 
This is a good example of where some calculations are better than arm waving. If you draw the circuit out, specifying the conditions ( supply voltage, resistor values etc.) and work out the current and power for the supply and the various resistors in the circuit, for various values, you will see the pattern. I mean work the values out yourself and not use an emulator. The sums are easy enough.
Of course, using symbols rather than numbers, the algebra will give you a better idea of what is happening - but it is not necessary if you really don't like Maths.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top