Help Strange problem with scientific calculator.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a problem with a Casio FX 115 ES scientific calculator that fails to compute the square of the reciprocal of a large number, specifically (1/4.2x10^52)^2, which should yield 5.7 x 10^-106. The calculator displays zero due to an "arithmetic underflow," as it cannot represent values less than -99 in the exponent. Users explain that the calculation can be broken down to avoid this issue, allowing for manual computation of the components, which can be done more efficiently than using the calculator. The conversation highlights the limitations of certain scientific calculators in handling very small numbers and the importance of understanding how to manipulate such calculations manually.
sunny79
Messages
77
Reaction score
8
Help!Strange problem with scientific calculator.

I was doing chemical equilibrium problems where one of the steps required me to square the reciprocal.

Which was (1/4.2x10^52)^2

The correct answer for this is 5.7 x 10^-106 but my Casio FX 115 ES calculator keeps showing zero.

Can anyone please shed some insight on this. It would be greatly appreciated. I have used this calculator in the past with success. I never encountered such a problem before. I have my exam on Tuesday. BTW no graphing calculators are allowed. If this doesnot workout then I will have to purchase another scientific calculator.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
sunny79 said:
Which was (1/4.2x10^52)^2

The correct answer for this is 5.7 x 10^-106

Welcome to PF :smile:
The calculator can't show a value greater than 99 or less than -99 in the power.(The maximum value available is 9*10^99 and minimum is (9*10^(-99))
(I have a Casio fx-100MS)
 
It is called an "arithmetic underflow".

Note that

\left(\frac 1 {4.2 \times 10^{52}}\right)^2 = \left(\frac 1 {4.2}\right)^2 \left(\frac 1 {10^{52}}\right)^2 = 0.057 \times \frac 1 {10^{104}} = 0.057 \times 10^{-104}

10-104 part can be done in memory faster than it takes to key numbers into calculator - you just need to understand what is going on and how to deal with such a situation.
 
Thanks guys, that helped a lot. :)
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top