Ionization, neutralization, electrical breakdown etc.

tendor
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
could someone direct me or recommend me some materials which deal with those problems?

I would like to get deeper understanding of it (I know it requires qm), see how exactly such things happens and be able to quantify it (not just with phenomenological theory).

For example when I get charged and move myself near enough to the metal door frame a spark will occur, or when I take piezo lighter - the electrode has "big enough charge/at same sharper places big enough electric field" that it's able to ionize the air around it.

But does it use already existing ions, or is it strong enough to create new ones? What exactly happens in processes of ionization and neutralization between an atom of particular gas and a certain metal (more elaborately than simple statement that electron jumps/tunnels from one thing to another)? Does an ion of some gas always neutralize itself when it "collides" with zero voltage (grounded) piece of metal? And so on...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phenomenon is more complex that most people realize. In fact, in accelerator/high gradient studies, this is still an ongoing research area.

The most popular model for breakdown in vacuum, for example, has the following steps:

1. Surface geometry that is sharp has high field-enhancement factor.

2. High fields cause electrons to be emitted via field-emission (tunneling). Regions around high field enchancement factor will emit more since the field is higher there.

3. The field-emitted electrons gain energy from the external field.

4. These electrons collide with residual gasses, creating ions.

5. As this goes on, the ions and electrons separate due to the external field. The ions are attracted towards the emitter surface while the electrons are pushed away.

6. The ions that crash onto the surface may, in turn, generate even more residual gas specie into the region above the surface of the emitter.

7. This process continues until you get a trigger point in which this ignites a plasma cascade that we call a "spark".

The process in air occurs earlier and easier than in vacuum due to the higher density of gasses to be ignited.

If you have access to IEEE articles, the best paper to read is by F. Schwirzke, IEEE Trans. Plasma Science v.18, p.690 (1991).

Zz.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top