Question regarding orbital hybridization in DFT

sidiq
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

I was wondering if anyone can tell me if or if not the wavefunctions used to construct the electron density in density functional theory contains hybridizied orbitals.

I have been working with a planewave pseudopotential code and in the input file of a pseudopotential, say Nickel, it only contains values for l=0 (s-orbital), l=1 (p-orbital) and l=2 (d-orbital). If I would want to calculate NiO, I would include another pseudopotential input file, Oxygen, which contains simply the s and p orbital terms.

Thus, as I understand it, the wavefunctions for Ni and O are built only from their respective atomic orbitals. My question is, do they get hybridizied? Is there an algorithm for these atomic orbitals to somehow be made into a t2g or eg orbital, thus initializing a new wavefunction to be fed into the DFT calculation?

Thank you for any help and I welcome any corrections to my understanding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hybridization isn't a concept of DFT or MO based theories but of valence bond theory, although certainly s, p, and d- orbitals can all make a contribution to a given MO in general.
There is code to use symmetry addapted linear combinations (SALC's) of AO's in computations. Details depend on the program you are using. The manual is your friend, here.
 
Thank you for the reply DrDu. It was really insightful for me.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top