Flow rate is calculated using only the parallel velocity

AI Thread Summary
Flow rate is determined by the parallel component of velocity to the area vector because only this component contributes to the volume output. The mathematical proof involves using the dot product, which effectively isolates the parallel component of the velocity vector. Any perpendicular velocity does not contribute to flow rate, as it does not affect the volume passing through a given area. The volumetric flow rate can be expressed as the dot product of the area vector and the velocity vector, confirming that only the parallel component matters. Thus, understanding the dot product is crucial for validating this relationship in fluid dynamics.
davidbenari
Messages
466
Reaction score
18
So flow rate is calculated using only the parallel velocity to the area vector. Why is this? How can I mathematically prove this? Namely, how do I prove any perpendicular component of the velocity vector is not contributing to any volume output? I know this is the result of the dot product; I want to know why the dot product is valid reasoning for this scenario.

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the entire velocity were perpendicular, what would be the flow rate?
 
Consider the definition of the volumetric flow rate

\dot{V}=\frac{dV}{dt}

say

V=\vec{A} \cdot \vec{x}

substitution yields

\dot{V}=\vec{A}\cdot\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt}=\vec{A}\cdot\vec{v}

where \vec{v}=\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt} and A materially conserved
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top