Electric dipole selection rules

yosofun
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am confused about the electric dipole selection rules.

Delta l = +/- 1
Delta m_l = 0, +/- 1

but are there rules for Delta j and Delta m_s and Delta n?

Is there a (semi-rigorous) way to conceptually understand selection rules?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yosofun said:
Hi,
I am confused about the electric dipole selection rules.
Delta l = +/- 1
Delta m_l = 0, +/- 1
but are there rules for Delta j and Delta m_s and Delta n?
Is there a (semi-rigorous) way to conceptually understand selection rules?
Thanks.
Sure, there is even a completely rigorous way! It is called the Wigner-Eckart theorem, and comes from the following fact:
the dipole interaction is essentially E.x, where E is given. In first order perturbation theory, the transition probability is given by the matrix element between the initial and final state of the perturbation, so you calculate: (final | E.x |initial).
E being a constant here, you are calculating the matrix elements of x in the |n,l,m> basis, and if you realize that x is the component of a vector (a spin-1 tensorial operator), with the Wigner-Eckart theorem, you arrive at the conclusion that this matrix element can only be non-zero when the selection rules you mentionned are satisfied.
cheers,
Patrick.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top