Centrieptal accleration and the poles of the earth

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal acceleration affects weight differently at the equator and the poles due to the Earth's rotation. At the equator, individuals experience a noticeable reduction in weight because they are in circular motion, requiring a force to maintain that motion. In contrast, at the poles, the effect is minimal since the circular motion around the Earth's axis does not significantly alter weight. The discussion draws parallels to experiences like being on a roller coaster, where centripetal forces are felt during loops. Overall, while centripetal acceleration does influence weight, its impact varies significantly based on geographic location.
huhmattg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Why does centripetal acceleration effect your weight at say that equator but not at the poles? Does it effect but just to a small extent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the poles, you are participating in the circular motion around the axis of rotation of the Earth. When you are at the equation, you are in circular motion. Remember the equations concerning circular motion? Some force is needed to keep you in orbit. You can experience something similar when you are on a roller coaster (at the top of the loop).
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

A rope, a pole, and some tension
Replies
11
Views
2K
A confused Compass Needle between two solenoids
Replies
31
Views
2K
Is My Calculation of Centripetal Acceleration and Tangential Velocity Correct?
Replies
12
Views
1K
Gravitational Field Strength at the equator and poles
Replies
23
Views
3K
Restrictions on the frame of reference
Replies
4
Views
1K
A Why do both poles of a radio pulsar emit radio waves?
Replies
7
Views
219
Foucault Pendulum at the North Pole
Replies
9
Views
2K
Gravitational Field Variation of Disc Orbitating Earth
Replies
4
Views
2K
Centripetal force on a person on the Earth
Replies
32
Views
6K
I Gravity at Earth's poles vs equator
Replies
12
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top