Is the Book Wrong? - Square Root of 4

AI Thread Summary
The textbook correctly states that the square root of 4 is 2, as the definition of the square root refers specifically to the positive value. While both 2 and -2 are solutions to the equation x² = 4, the square root function is defined to return only the principal (positive) root. This distinction often leads to confusion, especially when the context of the problem is not clearly outlined. Authors may omit details assuming readers understand the conventions of mathematical notation. Therefore, the book is not wrong; it adheres to standard mathematical definitions.
Numbnut247
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
hey guys on my textbook, it says that square root of 4 equals to 2 but not negative 2. The book is wrong right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What's the context? Maybe an absolute value symbol is hiding! Maybe its looking for solutions where a -2 would cause a divide by 0 or negative square root situation.
 
Just to extend on what Pengwuino said...

Textbook authors very often skip steps, or leave out what they feel to be implied information. Sometimes this is simply necessary if it's not relevant to the actual problem being discussed.

Physicists are notorious for doing this. They write math that may not be fully "correct," but they assume their readers know and understand the context of the mathematics.

For example, if a negative value doesn't make sense in the excerpt you're reading, the author assumed you knew and understood why s/he was discarding this value.

Unless the book you are reading is trying to teach you how to take the square root of something, then it's normal.. so get used to it ;)
 
Numbnut,

We have to take your word that the textbook said "square root" but I suspect it says \sqrt 4 = 2 (a true statement) while \sqrt 4 = -2 is definitely a false statement. However, there are, two real numbers whose squares are 4 (\sqrt 4 = 2 and -\sqrt 4 = -2).
 
Last edited:
Tide said:
Numbnut,

We have to take your word that the textbook said "square root" but I suspect it says \sqrt 4 = 2 (a true statement) while \sqrt 4 = -2 is definitely a false statement. However, there are, two real numbers whose squares are 4 (\sqrt 4 = 2 and -\sqrt 4 = -2).
But I think it's the part where (-2)^2 = 4 bothers him. Taking the square root of both sides...

But as was already mentioned, the context of the statement makes a difference.
 
Numbnut247 said:
hey guys on my textbook, it says that square root of 4 equals to 2 but not negative 2. The book is wrong right?

Your book is correct. The square root of a positive number a, is defined as the positive number x, such that x*x= a.


It is true that 2*2= 4 and that (-2)*(-2)= 4. Since 2 is the positive value the square root of 2 is 2.

Of course, if you were solving the equation x2= 4, you would have two answer: x= 2 and x= -2. That causes some people confusion.

Think of it this way: The solution to the equation x2= a (where a is a positive number) has to be written
x= \pm\sqrt{a}.
We have to have that "\pm" precisely because \sqrt{a} does not include the negative.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top