How Can You Prove the Laplace Transform of t^n?

AI Thread Summary
To prove the Laplace Transform of t^n, the expression is derived as n!/s^(n+1). The discussion emphasizes the necessity of using integration by parts to establish this result rigorously. The definition of the Laplace Transform is provided as L{f(t)} = ∫(0 to ∞) f(t) e^(-st) dt. A suggestion is made to differentiate the transform with respect to s, which allows for moving the derivative inside the integral, leading to a relationship involving t x(t). This method can be generalized for t^n, where x(t) is set as t.
seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Our professor asked us to derive an expression for the laplace transfrom of t^n. I did a few examples in MatLab and gathered that the Laplace Transform of t^n = n!/s^(n+1). I'm pretty sure this is correct, but I don't think my professor will be happy with it. I don't really know how I should go about proving it in a more sturdy way. I know I can integrate by parts for specific examples, but I'm not versed in integrating by parts with n's.

Any Suggestions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't see how you can get away without doing integration by parts. What is the definition of the Laplace transform?

<br /> L \{f(t) \} = \int_{0}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-st} dt<br />
BTW, you know that the n's are constants, right?
 
Last edited:
Let's say if you have

x(t) \iff X(s)

and you wish to find the Laplace transform of

t x(t)

Differentiate with respect to s of the Laplace transform integral. That is

\frac {d}{ds} \int_{0^-}^\infty t x(t) e^{-st} dt

You may move the derivative inside the integral and differentiate the exponential of the integrand.

Doing so you will see that t x(t) \iff - \frac {dX(s)}{s}

Try generalizing this for t^n. Note that for your specific problem

x(t) = t
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top