Understanding Clamper Circuit: Solving Output Waveform Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the output waveform of a clamper circuit in relation to the input square wave voltage. The initial confusion arises from the output voltage during the negative half cycle, where the participant calculates it as -2V, contrasting with the textbook answer of (2V - V1). Clarification is provided regarding the diode's behavior, indicating that it clamps the output voltage at V1 during the positive half cycle, and the negative swing should be considered from this point. The participant acknowledges a typo in their understanding of the capacitor's charging potential, realizing it should be (V - V1). The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the clamping effect of the diode in circuit analysis.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# Draw the output waveform for the following clamper circuit. Assume that 5y = 5RC >> T/2 where y = time constant of the RC circuit, T = time period of the input square wave voltage.

I solved it in the following way:

Positive half cycle of input voltage
During positive half of input voltage when V=V1, D1 exists in forward biased condition. Hence, V-output = V1.

Negative half cycle of input voltage
During negative half cycle, D1 exists in reverse biased condition. Hence V-output = Potential difference across resistance R = (-V) + (-V) where one –V is due to the input voltage and the other –V is due to the charged capacitor. Hence V-output = -2V. But the difference between my output waveform and the output waveform given in my book is that in my book they have taken 2V downwards from V1 whereas I have taken it from the origin. As per the book answer, the output voltage at a time T/2 is (2V – V1). How can that be possible when an output voltage of -2V is obtained during the negative half cycle of input voltage?
But in a clamper circuit, the output waveform has the same voltage swing as the input waveform. So, my answer is wrong but I don’t know where I have gone wrong. Could anyone please help me with this problem?
 

Attachments

  • Clamper Circuit.JPG
    Clamper Circuit.JPG
    17.9 KB · Views: 2,251
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Amith, this really belongs in the homework forums (your previous similar question "Clipper circuit problem" was correctly placed there), but I'll try to address it here anyway.

It's a little over-simplified to say that the diode is in forward conduction for the positive half cycle of the input voltage. That's not really true. The diode is in forward conduction when the anode is more positive than the cathode. For a real diode, it will settle with about 0.7V of forward voltage drop (depending on current, temperature, etc.). For the ideal diode that seems to be used in your homework problems, they seem to be assuming a 0V drop across a dead short for the diode.

That's why the output voltage clamps at V1 (plus the 0V idealized diode forward drop) for the positive half-cycle. I think that the reason that the negative half cycle ends up at -(V-V1) is that the swing down in voltage of -2V starts at V1 because of the isolating capacitor, instead of startiong at +V if it were DC-connected. In fact, it looks more like the answer should be V1-2V for the bottom half cycle. Are you sure the text answer is correct?
 
Though it is a homework problem, being an engineering topic I thought it would be better to post it here. You have rightly pointed out that the swing in the negative direction is (V1 - 2V). I am extremely sorry. Its a typo. During the positive half cycle will the capacitor be charged to a potential of (V - V1) and not V because V and V1 are acting in opposite directions?
 
Amith2006 said:
Though it is a homework problem, being an engineering topic I thought it would be better to post it here. You have rightly pointed out that the swing in the negative direction is (V1 - 2V). I am extremely sorry. Its a typo. During the positive half cycle will the capacitor be charged to a potential of (V - V1) and not V because V and V1 are acting in opposite directions?
No need to be sorry. I could see that you use the homework forums, so I didn't think you were trying anything strange with the post. But yes, the PF guidelines are pretty straightforward about posting homework problems in other forums. It's usually only allowed for graduate-level work and larger projects. Just skim over the guidelines in the homework forum to clarify.

And I wouldn't use the words "V and V1 are acting in opposite directions". I think it's better to think about the clamping aspect of the diode when it's forward biased. Because the diode has a low impedance when in forward bias, that clamps the output voltage at the V1 supply voltage. The V1 power supply ideally has a very low output impedance, so it will sink or source whatever current is necessary to maintain the V1 voltage across its output terminals. Of course, with the diode nosing into the V1 power supply as in your figure, the V1 power supply can only sink current, not source any current to the outside circuit. Hope that helps.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top