Moment of inertia for a rectangular plate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the moment of inertia for a rectangular plate and a sphere. For the rectangular plate with area ab and an axis through the center, the correct moment of inertia is derived as (1/12)(M)(a^2 + b^2). The method involves integrating the distance from each point on the plate to the axis of rotation, leading to the formula after substituting the mass M in terms of area density. For the sphere, the moment of inertia is correctly calculated as (2/5)MR^2, using spherical coordinates and integrating the volume elements. The confusion arises from incorrect setups leading to an alternative result of (3/5)MR^2. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper integration techniques and coordinate systems in deriving these formulas, clarifying where common mistakes may occur.
allergic
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
can anyone help me derive the moment of inertia for a rectangular plate, area of ab, (with the axis through the center)? i know it ends up being (1/12)(M)(a^2+b^2) but when i try it, my a's and b's end up canceling... its craziness. also, when i try the sphere, instead of (2/5)MR^2, i get(3/5)MR^2...
thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say where you went wrong since you don't tell us what you did but this is how I would do that problem:
The moment of inertia about a lamina (two-dimensional figure) with area density ρ is

\int\int\rho r^2 dA where r is the distance from each point to the axis of rotation and dA is the differential of area.

In this problem, take the center of the rectangle to be at (0,0) so the vertices are (a/2, b/2), etc. Then the distance from (x,y) to the axis of rotation (passing through (0,0)perpendicular to the plate) is √(x2+ y2) and the moment of inertia is
\int_{-a/2}^{a/2}\int_{-b/2}^{b/2}\rho (x^2+ y^2)dydx
= \int_{-a/2}^{a/2}\rho(bx^2+ \frac{1}{12}b^3)dx
= \frac{1}{12}\rho(a^3b+ ab^3).

Since M= ab ρ the moment of inertia is
\frac{M}{12}(a^2+b^2).
 
Similarly, for the sphere, set up spherical coordinates so that the sphere, of radius R, has center at (0,0,0) and the axis of rotation is the z-axis. Then the distance from each point to the axis is just the projection to the xy-plane, \rho sin\phi and differential of volume is \rho^2sin\phi d\rho d\phi d\theta so the moment of inertia, with density \lambda is given by
\int_0^\pi\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^R(\lambda\rho^4sin^3\phi)d\rho d\theta d\phi
= \lambda (\int_0^{2\pi} d\theta )(\int_0^R\rho^4d\rho)(\int_0^\pi sin^3\phi d\phi)

The first two of those can be integrated directly and give
(2\pi)(\frac{1}{5}R^5).
To integrate the third, let u= cos\phi and we get
\frac{4}{3}. The moment of inertia is given by
\frac{8}{15}\pi\lambda R^5.

Since the mass is M= \lambda\frac{4}{3}R^3, the moment of inertia is \frac{2}{5}\pi R^2.
 
thanks that helps a lot. now i know i was missing something important..
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top