Jackson Electrodynamics Problem 2.3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving Jackson's Electrodynamics Problem 2.3, which involves a line charge and two conducting planes, using the method of images. The first three parts of the problem are straightforward, but the fourth part, which asks for the electric field far from the origin, poses challenges. The original poster struggles to understand how to apply a Taylor expansion to find the solution, despite finding a link to a solution that partially makes sense. They express confusion over the steps involved in the Taylor series solution and seek clarification on its application to the problem. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clearer explanations of the Taylor expansion process in this context.
Locrian
Messages
1,881
Reaction score
256
The problem and a solution can both be found here. In this problem there is a line charge and two conducting planes at the axis. You use the method of images to solve it. The first three parts are easy enough. The fourth asks what the electric field is far from the origin.

I do not know how to find that. I've found two separate solutions, both of which write the potential, wave hands, and promptly write the answer. The link above says "Here we simply need to Taylor expand the expression in (1)." I can do a simple Taylor expansion, so I have an idea what it looks like, but I have no clue what it has to do with this problem. The author's next two equations are just (1) multiplied out, with some jabber inbetween I can't make heads or tails of. Then they write the answer.

Could anyone help me along in how this answer is found? I have actually spent a great deal of time trying to figure out how this is solved, but I cannot seem to get the solution.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aha! There is a solution http://homerreid.ath.cx/~homer/physics/jackson/index.shtml that actually makes a bit of sense.

Still, if anyone has some comments on Taylor expansions I'd appreciate it. I do not understand how one would use a Taylor expansion in this problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That solultion is the Taylor series solution. It is a two dimension Taylor expansion in {\vec r_0}/r.
 
That's almost exactly what the first link wrote. Unfortunately it is no help to me at all. If you know of a place that actually shows the problem being worked out in that manner please let me know.

Thanks for the response.
 
I meant to say that the steps in Homer's solution to part (d) is precisely a two dimensional Taylor expansion. It IS "the problem being worked out in that manner".
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top