Moles of Potassium Alum in 2KAl(SO_4)_2 * 12H_2O

  • Thread starter Thread starter skybox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the mole count in the formula for Potassium Alum, 2KAl(SO₄)₂ * 12H₂O. It confirms that there is 1 mole of potassium alum in the entire structure, despite having 2 moles of potassium and aluminum. The distinction arises from how potassium alum is defined in relation to the formula. If potassium alum is defined as KAl(SO₄)₂ * 12H₂O, then 2 moles of aluminum would equate to 2 moles of potassium alum. Ultimately, the correct interpretation is that 2 moles of aluminum react with 2 moles of potassium alum, establishing a 1:1 ratio.
skybox
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I know the formula for Potassium Alum is:

2KAl(SO_{4})_{2} * 12H_{2}O

Now does this mean that there are 2 Moles of Potassium Alum or 24 moles of Potassium Alum if you include the 12 water molecules? I know when you calculate the molar mass of Potassium Alum, you need to add in the molar mass of the 12 water molecules.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means there are 2 moles of potassium alum in that formula as written. The '*' just means that each molecule set 2KAl(SO_{4})_{2} is surrounded by 12 molecules of water. But if that is the exact formula for potassium alum then 2KAl(SO_{4})_{2} * 12H_{2}O is only 1 mole. There are 2 moles of potassium and 2 moles of aluminum, but that entire structure is only 1 mole of potassium alum.
 
Hi dmoravec, thanks for the reply. I am just confused on how there can be only 1 mole for that whole structure.

I just need help on converted moles of aluminum to moles of alum.

2K^+ + 2Al^+3 + 4SO_{4}^-2 + 12H_{2}O --> 2KAl(SO_{4})_{2} * H_{2}O

Now does this mean that 2 moles of Aluminum react with 2 moles of Potassium Alum or just 1 mole, as you mentioned above, of Postassium Alum?

Thanks again
 
well, its a bit nitpicky and just depends on naming but it could be either depending on how you define 1 molecule of potassium alum and how exactly the right side of the equation is written. If potassium alum is defined as 2KAl(SO_{4})_{2} * 12H_{2}O then it would be 2 moles of aluminum equating with 1 mole of potassium alum. If potassium alum is defined as KAl(SO_{4})_2*12H_{2}O then it would be 2 moles of aluminum equating with 2 moles of potassium alum.

(the difference lies in the formula above being (2KAl(SO_{4})_2*12H_{2}O) or
2(KAl(SO_{4})_2*12H_{2}O))
 
Thanks dmoravec...the formula is actually written as the latter, with the 2 on the outside of the entire formula, so it must be 2 moles of aluminum reacting with 2 moles of potassium alum, in other words a 1:1 ratio. Thanks again, it was a big help
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top