Can Lorentz Transformation Explain Magnetism and the Lorentz Force?

Aero
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I read somewhere that the whole of magnetism, and in particular the lorentz force, can be found merely by applying the lorentz transformation to transform the coordinates of the electric field of a charged particle from the frame in which the particle is at rest to a frame in which the particle is moving.

I am finding it difficult to do this, mostly because I thought that the lorentz transformation transforms the coordinates of spacetime events and not vector fields. How can you fit vector fields into a four-dimensional spacetime?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aero said:
coordinates of the electric field
You mean COMPONENTS of the electric field.

Aero said:
I am finding it difficult to do this, mostly because I thought that the lorentz transformation transforms the coordinates of spacetime events and not vector fields. How can you fit vector fields into a four-dimensional spacetime?

Thanks

Lorentz Transformations applied to the spacetime of Special Relativity do transform coordinates of spactime events. However, Lorentz Transformations can also be applied to the "tangent [vector] space" [also a Minkowski vector space] of an event, which transforms components of vectors and tensors based at that event.

The spatial vector fields you seek are components of an antisymmetric tensor F_{ab}.
Depending on sign conventions, given an observer with 4-velocity u^a, the electric field according to that observer is u^aF_{ab} and the magnetic field according to that observer is u^a \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ab}{}^{cd}F_{cd}. Note that each field [co]vector is spacelike, in fact, purely-spatial [i.e. orthogonal] to u^a
 
Last edited:
The E and B fields are components of a second rank tensor in a Lorentz transformation. You just have to study a good book on SR.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top