What are the potential dangers and advancements in wireless power transmission?

AI Thread Summary
Wireless power transmission has historical roots, with Tesla's early experiments highlighting its potential. Current discussions emphasize the dangers of using high-power microwave frequencies, which could resemble hypothetical death rays. While space-based solar power could provide continuous energy, the economics and practicality of such systems are questioned, particularly given the availability of land for terrestrial solar projects. Concerns about energy conversion efficiency and the need for large exclusion zones further complicate the feasibility of these technologies. Overall, advancements in optical approaches may offer a more viable alternative to traditional microwave transmission methods.
MedievalMan
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Nothing new, ofcourse, in principle. Tesla experimented with it many years ago ;)

It has worked somewhat efficiently on a small scale (see http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/wireless-power.htm)

The beginning of this article mentions how it is dangerous, but the end says we may need to someday beam lots of power from solar panel satellites and/or a moon base to get some more power to meet growing demands.

My thoughts are:
Using microwave frequency EM waves, at very high power levels (even if MIT research gets them to be very directive, instead of spreading out equally in all directions) seems kind of dangerous to me.

Any thoughts from fellow engineers, physics gurus or hobbyists? :)

Had to mention the Tesla Roadster:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/tesla-roadster2.htm
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
MedievalMan said:
Using microwave frequency EM waves, at very high power levels (even if MIT research gets them to be very directive, instead of spreading out equally in all directions) seems kind of dangerous to me.
That greatly understates it. Yes, such schemes are too similar to hypothetical death rays. It sounds like the Diamonds are Forever James Bond film.

Besides danger, the economics of space-based PV panels are very unattractive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and sophiecentaur
All these space-based ideas for Power Generation ignore the fact that we are really not short of land area for solar projects. The day / night effect on surface arrays could be said to be relevant, compared with near 24 hour coverage for a satellite but that seems, to me, to be the only thing in favour of the space borne approach. Just how overall efficient would the energy conversion be for the Power Down-link? Massive areas would be needed for receiving arrays plus large exclusion zones would be needed around the sites.
True- the reliability of orbiting equipment is extremely good and there are always possible effects of weather and life forms on land based equipment. But it's much more convenient to maintain and it can be sited to suit the community. HV DC transmission wire links are very good value.
 
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top