Sign of the gyromagnetic ratio

Jarl
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have posted this doubt in other forums and people don't know the answer. (sorry if my English is not very good!)

Let's see: to obtain the operator for the magnetic moment component of a particle, we have to apply a few factors to the spin operator, and one of them, the so-called 'gyromagnetic ratio' can be positive or negative depending on the particle, for example it is positive for protons and negative for neutrons.

Does this sign have any observable effect?
Thanks in advance,


(Maybe this should be in the nuclear and particle sub-forum?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sign has a measurable effect.
It enters in adding the magnetic moments of the p and n to calculate the magnetic moment of the deuteron.
 
It does have a measurable effect. The sign of the gyromagnetic ratio determines the direction with which the spin precesses in a magnetic field. If the spin is used as a gyroscope to determine the rotation rate of the apparatus, then the sign of the frequency shift depends on the sign of the gyromagnetic ratio.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top