How do you model functions to fit given conditions?

AI Thread Summary
To model the function f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c given the conditions f(-1) = 3 and f(1) = 3, the equations simplify to 3 = a - b + c and 3 = a + b + c. This leads to the conclusion that b = 0, allowing the function to be rewritten as f(x) = ax^2 + c. However, with only two conditions and three coefficients, there are infinitely many solutions, as any values of a and c that satisfy a + c = 3 will work. Thus, c can be expressed in terms of a as c = 3 - a, resulting in multiple valid parabolas passing through the specified points. The discussion highlights the importance of having enough conditions to uniquely determine a quadratic function.
pakmingki
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
for example, i want to find the coeffiecients of a function f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c for these given conditions:
f(-1) = 3
f(1) = 3

i tried plugging and chugging
for the first condition:
3 = a - b + c
3 = a + b + c

now i tried subtracting the system to get
0 = 2b
so its solved that b = 0

so now we got a step further towards the goal, and we know we can right the function as
f(x) = ax^2 + c
so now we try plugging and chugging again, but then we get
3 = a + c
3 = a + c
since they are the same equation, i don't know how we can solve for a and c.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lol you got the equation down to ax^2+c yes? Well for -1 and 1, x^2 is 1!

So now you have it down to a+c=3! No need to solve for, choose any values :D
1 and 2, 3 and 0, -4 and 7, whatever you want :D
 
pakmingki said:
for example, i want to find the coeffiecients of a function f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c for these given conditions:
f(-1) = 3
f(1) = 3
You have an obvious problem here- your quadratic, f(x)= ax2+ bx+ c, has three coefficients and you only have two conditions. Given three points, not on a straight line, there exist a unique quadratic passing through them- but there are an infinite number of parabolas passing through two given points.

i tried plugging and chugging
for the first condition:
3 = a - b + c
3 = a + b + c

now i tried subtracting the system to get
0 = 2b
so its solved that b = 0

so now we got a step further towards the goal, and we know we can right the function as
f(x) = ax^2 + c
so now we try plugging and chugging again, but then we get
3 = a + c
3 = a + c
since they are the same equation, i don't know how we can solve for a and c.

Yes, as I said, you don't have enough conditions. You can solve for c in terms of a: c= 3- a. All of the parabolas given by f(x)= ax2+ 3- a will pass through (1, 3) and (-1, 3).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top