Proof for Axes of an Ellipse - Analytical Geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Ellipse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the formulas for the axes of an ellipse, specifically a² = p²/(1-e²)² for the semi-major axis and b² = p²/(1-e²) for the semi-minor axis. The polar equation of an ellipse is presented, with p as the semi-latus rectum and e as the eccentricity. By applying the Pythagorean theorem and the relationship between the axes and the distance to the foci, the derivation shows that a = p/(1-e²) and b = a√(1-e²). Ultimately, the discussion confirms that the expressions for a and b are valid representations of the ellipse's axes.
sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
in my textbook says that a^2=p^2/(1-e^2)^2, and b^2=p^2/(1-e^2), are two axes of an ellipse, however there is no any proof as to how we can be sure that a and b are such axes. Where p is the focal parameter, and e is the eccentricity of the ellipse; a- is the big semi-axes, b- the small one.So i would like to know is there any proof that ensures us that the above expressions are indeed or represent the axes of any ellipse??
I asked the assistant proffesor on my Analytical Geometry class, but she did not know how to proof it.

Any help would be welcomed.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
242889


The polar equation of an ellipse is ##r = \frac{p}{1 + e\cos \theta}##, where ##p## is the semi-latus rectum and ##e## is the eccentricity of the ellipse. The origin is a focus e.g. ##F## of the ellipse. The other focus of the ellipse is ##F'##. When ##\theta = 0^0## we have ##cos \theta = 1## and for ##\theta = 180^0##, ##\cos \theta = -1##. So, if ##a## is the semi-major axis, we have:
##2a = \frac{p}{1 + e} + \frac{p}{1 - e} = \frac{2p}{1 - e^2}##. Hence, ##a = \frac{p}{1 - e^2}##.

242896


Now, let ##c## be the distance from the center (coordinate axes intersection) to either focus, let's say ##F##.
We see that ##c = a - \frac{p}{1 + e} = \frac{ep}{1 - e^2} = ea##. If ##b## is the semi-minor axis - e.g. in the upper half of the ellipse in the above diagram, and if we draw a line that connects the focus ##F## to the point that semi-minor axis ##b## intersects the ellipse, we have a right triangle. Its two perpendicular sides are ##c## and ##b## and its hypotenuse is ##a##. Using Pythagorean theorem and utilizing the fact that ##c = ea##, as we saw above, we find that ##b = a \sqrt{1 - e^2}##. Now, using the expression we obtained before for ##a## we have

##b = \frac{p}{1 - e^2} \cdot \sqrt{1 - e^2}##

So, the (semi)axes ##a## and ##b## can indeed be written in a way, such that, if we square the final expressions we found, we have the expressions asked in the OP.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top