Fermi-dirac statistics, Griffiths 5.28

AI Thread Summary
At absolute zero, the chemical potential equals the Fermi energy, E_f, which impacts the evaluation of integrals 5.108 and 5.109 for identical fermions. The discussion highlights the importance of the temperature dependence in the exponential's denominator and the need to consider the behavior of the integrand based on whether the energy is above or below the chemical potential. It is noted that for energies below the Fermi energy, the argument approaches negative infinity, while for energies above, the integrand approaches zero. A crucial observation is that the limits of integration should be adjusted to k values that do not exceed the Fermi energy to ensure convergence. The same method applies to both integrals, emphasizing the necessity of integrating only up to k_F.
Elvex
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Evaluate the integrals (eqns 5.108 and 5.109) for the case of identical fermions at absolute zero.


Homework Equations



5.108
N=\frac{V}{2\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{k^2}{e^{[(\hbar^{2}k^{2}/2m)-\mu]/kT}+1}dk

5.109
E=\frac{V}{2\pi^2}\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{k^4}{e^{[(\hbar^{2}k^{2}/2m)-\mu]/kT}+1}dk

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so at absolute zero, the chemical potential is equal to the fermi energy E_f. I'm not sure how to approach either integral because of the T dependence in the denominator in the argument of the exponential.
Aren't there two cases, one for the energy of the state being above the chemical potential, and another for it being less than.
If the energy is less, then the argument goes to - infinite, and the integral is just of k^2, from 0 to infinite... that doesn't seem right.
If the energy is greater than mu, then the argument goes to positive infinite, and the integrand goes to 0. Fantastic.

There's got to be something going on with the expressions in the argument of hte exponential to give a reasonable integrand for T=0.
I think I'm missing some crucial observation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at equations [5.103] and [5.104].
 
OK, so for the first integral. I have a feeling that I need to change the limits of integration because once I get to k values that exceed the Fermi-Energy, the integrand goes to zero, so setting the upper limit to a specific k value will ensure convergence as well.

Oh ok, this is the probably the same method for the second integral as well.
 
Elvex said:
OK, so for the first integral. I have a feeling that I need to change the limits of integration because once I get to k values that exceed the Fermi-Energy, the integrand goes to zero, so setting the upper limit to a specific k value will ensure convergence as well.

Oh ok, this is the probably the same method for the second integral as well.

Yes, in both cases you must integrate up to k_F only (the k value at the Fermi energy).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top