Group Velocity: Estimating for Differing Wavenumbers

AI Thread Summary
Group velocity can be defined for waves with varying wavenumbers, but its meaningfulness diminishes when the wavenumbers are significantly different. For two waves with closely spaced wavenumbers, the group velocity is calculated as (w2-w1)/(k2-k1), while for a broader range of wavenumbers, it is advisable to evaluate the derivative dw/dk at a central value k0. If dω/dk is not constant, the wave packet's shape will change over time, but a group velocity can still be defined, albeit with caution regarding its variability due to dispersion. The concept of group velocity is most applicable when the wavenumbers are closely grouped, as larger spreads can complicate its utility. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurately applying group velocity in dispersive media.
hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
I am wondering if group velocity can defined only for waves with very close wavenumber?
I see a number of simulations which shows the superposition of two waves with slighlty different wavenumber and angular frequency, and a train of wave pulses is produced. The group velocity is then (w2-w1)/(k2-k1).

But what if it is two waves of very different wavenumber?

And also, for waves that is composed of a range of values of k, where shall I evluate the group velocity i.e. the derivative dw/dt at?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the concept of "group velocity" has meaning only when \omega is a linear function of k, or nearly so. Then the derivative d\omega / dk is a constant, or nearly so, and it doesn't make any difference what value of k you evaluate the derivative at.

If d\omega / dk isn't constant, the packet changes shape as time passes, and eventually "falls apart".
 
jtbell said:
I think the concept of "group velocity" has meaning only when \omega is a linear function of k, or nearly so. Then the derivative d\omega / dk is a constant, or nearly so, and it doesn't make any difference what value of k you evaluate the derivative at.

If d\omega / dk isn't constant, the packet changes shape as time passes, and eventually "falls apart".

If dw/dk is not constant, so what is the group velocity at every instant time? Though the packet changes shape as time passes, it shall still have a group velocity, isn't it? Just that the shape of the envelop changes but not the group velocity...?

And I actually see some books having Cg = 1-k^-2 etc...so...what does it mean?
 
I am thinking about the following:
That group velocity is for a group of waves that have a range of wavenumbers that is closed together (or dominated by such a group of wavenumbers) so that
k0 - delta < k <k0 +delta, where the dominating range of wavenumbers is around k0.

So, the group of waves can be viewed as a single harmonic wave of wavenumber k0 but with a varying envelope A(x,t). Just like the case of "beats".

So, the group velocity is dw/dk evaluated at k=k0.

So no matter the wave is dispersive or non-dispersive, the group velocity is still k=k0. But for dispersive waves, the envelop function will spread out or flatten as time passes.

Do you think I am thinking correctly? Is the concepts of group velocity has meaning only when the wavenumbers are dominated by a small group of wavenumbers / the wavenumbers are close enough together?
 
We can still define a group velocity, one just has to be mindful that group velocity will vary with frequency in a medium, due to material dispersion. Dispersive behaviour is contained within higher order derivative terms, d^2w/dk^2 and so forth.

Claude.
 
Claude Bile said:
We can still define a group velocity, one just has to be mindful that group velocity will vary with frequency in a medium, due to material dispersion. Dispersive behaviour is contained within higher order derivative terms, d^2w/dk^2 and so forth.

Claude.

Suppose the group velocity cg = 1-k^-2. And there is a group of waves with different values of k, so what value of k shall I use to find the group velocity?
 
Pick a reasonable central value. If the spread in k is so large that vg would be very different for different choices, then group velocity is not a useful concept.
The packet would spread so much that a packet velocity would be hard to specify.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top